Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We measured listeners' directional sensitivity for narrow bands of noise and for speech recognition while they were wearing the XM45 gas mask and hood and compared it to normal free-field listening. Bekesy tracking was used to measure absolute hearing thresholds for 1/3 octave bands of noise centered at 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 kHz. and masked intelligibility thresholds for speech were measured using the Modified Rhyme Test. Both the noise and speech signals were presented from loudspeakers located at azimuths of 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, and 180°. The mask and hood significantly elevated noise-band thresholds for those bands centered at 1.0 kHz and above. Sensitivity to masked speech was increased by over 12 dB by lateral loudspeaker placement, and wearing a gas mask and hood reduced this gain by 80 percent. These results document a loss of auditory spatial awareness that has not been apparent from previous studies of speech intelligibility while wearing chemical protective equipment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bensel

C. K.

Teixeira

R. A.

Kaplan

D. B.

(1987). The Effects of U. S. Army Protective Clothing on Speech Intelligibility, Visual Field, Body Mobility, and Psychomotor Coordination on Men. Technical Report, NATICK TR-87/037.

Bronkhorst

A. W.

Plomp

(1988). The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 1508–1516.

Durlach

N. I.

Colburn

S. H.

(1978). Binaural phenomena. In Carterette

E. C.

Friedman

M. P.

Handbook of Perception. New York: Academic Press, 365–466.

Egan

J. P.

(1943). The Effects of Army Gas Masks on Speech Communication. OSRD Report No. 1816. Harvard Psycho-Acoustic Lab, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

Garinther

G. R.

Hodge

D. C.

(1987). Effect of the M25 Protective Mask and Hood on Speech Intelligibility and Voice Level. Technical Memorandum 19–87, Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.

Green

D. M.

(1990). Stimulus selection in adaptive psychophysical procedures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 2662–2674.

Hah

Gilman

J. P.

Weiss

R. A.

(1996). Effects of wearing an M40 mask with hood on speech production and perception. Proceedings of the Third Annual U. S. Army Research Laboratory/ United States Military Academy Technical Symposium (pp. 47–61). West Point, NY.

House

A. S.

Williams

C. E.

Hecker

M. H. L.

Kryter

(1965). Articulation-testing methods: Consonantal differentiation with a closed-response set.

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 37, 158–166.

10.

Johnson

R. F.

Sleeper

L. A.

(1985). Effects of thermal stress and chemical protective clothing on speech intelligibility. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society (pp. 541–545). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

11.

Myers

C. K.

(1957). Noise bands versus pure tones as stimuli for audiometry. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 22, 757–760.

12.

Zurek

P. M.

(1993). Binaural advantages and directional effects in speech intelligibility. In Studebaker

G. A.

Hochberg

(Eds) Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. 255–276.

13.

Welker

D. P.

Greenberg

J. E.

Desloge

J. G.

Zurek

P. M.

(1997). Microphone-array hearing aids with binaural output. II. A two-microphone adaptive system. IEEE Transactions on Speech an Audio Processing (in review).

The Effect of the XM45 Gas Mask and Hood on Directional Hearing

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References