Using a Computer Simulated World to Study Behavioral Compliance with Warnings: Effects of Salience and Gender

Abstract

Warning signs are intended to alert persons to potential dangers in the environment. Despite its importance, empirical studies measuring behavioral compliance with warnings are limited due to methodological difficulties and ethical considerations in conducting the research. The present study used a computer simulated world as a new method for studying behavioral compliance. Such simulations can be constructed to appear realistic, thus maintaining ecological validity, while allowing control over experimental conditions. Three factors (time stress, salience, and sign type) were manipulated to determine their effects on a simulated egress task from an underground mine. Gender was also introduced as an additional independent variable. Results indicated signs with salient features increased compliance compared to signs without those features. Time stress and sign type failed to show significant effects. In general, women complied more frequently than men. Use of computer simulated worlds in warning compliance research is discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American National Standards Institute (1991). Sign, color and symbol standards. Z535.1–5. Arlington, VA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association.

Zur

H. Ben

Breznitz

S. J.

(1981). The effect of time pressure on risky choice behavior Acta Psychologica, 47, 89–104.

Braun

C. C.

Silver

N. C.

(1995). Interaction of signal word and colour on warning labels: Differences in perceived hazard and behavioural compliance. Ergonomics, 38, 2207–2220.

Jaynes

L. S.

Boles

D. B.

(1990). The effect of symbols on warning compliance. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting (pp. 984–987). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Collins

B. L.

Lerner

N. D.

(1982). Assessment of fire-safety symbols. Human Factors, 24, 75–84.

Cox

E. P.

Hoyer

W. D.

Krshna

(1995). The behavior effectiveness of on-product warnings in low hazard conditions. Marketing and Public Policy Conference Proceedings (pp. 1–10). American Marketing Association.

Laughery

K. R.

Brelsford

J. W.

(1991). Receiver characteristics in safety communications. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting (pp. 1068–1072). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Laughery

K. R.

Wogalter

M. S.

Young

S. L.

(1994). Human Factors Perspectives on Warnings: Selections from Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meetings 1980 — 1993. Santa Monica: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Laughery

K. R.

Young

S. L.

Vaubel

K. P.

Brelsford

J. W.

(1993). The noticeability of warnings on alcoholic beverage containers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12, 38–56.

10.

Lehto

M. R.

Miller

J. M.

(1988). The effectiveness of warning labels. Journal of Products Liability, 11, 225–270.

11.

Magurno

A. B.

Wogalter

M. S.

(1994). Behavioral compliance with warnings: Effects of stress and placement. Proceedings of the Human Factor and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting (pp. 826–830). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

12.

McGuice

W. J.

(1980). The communication-persuasion model and health risk labeling (pp. 99–122). In Morris

L. A.

Mazis

M. B.

Barofsky

, Banbury Report 6: Product Labeling and Health Risks. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

13.

Moray

Dessouky

M. I.

Kijowski

B. A.

Adapathya

(1991). Strategic behavior, workload, and performance in task scheduling. Human Factors, 33, 607–629.

14.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (1993). Accident prevention signs and tags, 1926.200. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Labor, OSHA.

15.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (1996). Specifications for accident prevention signs and tags, 1910.145. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Labor, OSHA.

16.

Safety Sign Company (1995). Signs & markers: safety signs — labels — decals — markers — tapes, numbers — letters & other identification products. Cleveland, OH: Safety Sign Company, 82.

17.

Strawbridge

J. A.

(1986). The influence of position, highlighting, and imbedding on warning effectiveness. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting (pp. 716–720). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

18.

Wogalter

M. S.

Dingus

T. A.

(in press). Chapter 4: Methodological techniques of evaluating behavioral intentions and compliance/adherence. In Wogalter

M. S.

DeJoy

D. M.

Laughery

K. R.

Warnings and Risk Communication, London: Taylor & Francis.

19.

Wogalter

M. S.

Godfrey

S. S.

Fontenelle

G. A.

Desaulniers

D. R.

Rothstein

P. R.

Laughery

K. R.

(1987). Effectiveness of warnings. Human Factors, 29, 599–612.

20.

Wogalter

M. S.

Rashid

(1997). Effects of time stress and social monitoring on warning compliance. Presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

21.

Young

S. L.

Wogalter

M. S.

Laughery

K. R.

Magurno

A. B.

Lovvoll

(1995). Relative order and space allocation of message components in hazard warning signs (pp. 969–973). Proceedings of the Human Factor and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

22.

Zakay

Wooler

(1984). Time pressure, training, and decision effectiveness. Ergonomics, 27, 273–284.