Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Human-computer interaction (HCI) has been identified as a rich task for the real-world study of psychology; however, the theoretical approaches to the psychology of HCI have narrowly focused on problem-solving (e.g., GOMS and CE+), memory (e.g., mental models and metaphors), and social interaction (e.g., perceived control). An attempt to create a broader theoretical framework integrates the three approaches to the psychology of HCI with a theory, IP³. This paper (1) discusses each of the three psychologies of HCI, (2) describes the integrative theory, IP³ (verbally, as well as by a graphical representation), (3) applies the theory to one representative research area—transfer of training, and (4) applies the theory to the interpretation of selected HCI design guidelines.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J.R.

(1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications (4th ed.). New York: Freeman.

Card

S.K.

Moran

T.P.

Newell

(1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cooke

N.J.

Breedin

S.D.

(1994). Constructing naive theories of motion on the fly. Memory & Cognition, 22, 474–493.

Davis

F.D.

Bagozzi

R.P.

Warshaw

P.R.

(1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003.

Gillan

D.J.

Bias

R.G.

(1994). Use and abuse of metaphor in human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Vol 2) (pp. 1433–1439). New York: IEEE.

Gillan

D.J.

Cooke

N.J.

(1996). Making usability data more usable. Unpublished technical report.

Gilman

E.M.

(1996). Effects of metaphors on semantic memory. Unpublished Master's thesis. New Mexico State University.

Gong

Elkerton

(1990). Designing minimal documentation using a GOMS model: A usability evaluation of an engineering approach. In CHI'90 Conference Proceedings (pp. 99–106). New York: ACM.

Gray

W.D.

John

B.E.

Atwood

M.E.

(1992). The precis of Project Ernestine or an overview of a validation of GOMS. In CHI'92 Conference Proceedings (pp. 307–312). New York: ACM.

10.

Irving

Poison

Irving

J.E.

(1994). In CHI'94 Conference Proceedings (pp. 344–350). New York: ACM.

11.

Kieras

D.E.

Poison

P.G.

(1985). An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22, 365–394.

12.

Kallin

Gillan

D.J.

(1997). The role of perceived control in users' affective responses to computers. In preparation.

13.

Lewis

Poison

Wharton

Rieman

(1990). Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces. In CHI'90 Conference Proceedings (pp. 235–242). New York: ACM.

14.

Mayhew

(1992). Principles and guidelines in software user interface design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

15.

Nass

Steuer

Tauber

E.R.

(1994). Computers are social actors. In CHI'94 Conference Proceedings (pp. 72–78). New York: ACM.

16.

Newell

Simon

H.A.

(1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

17.

Norman

D.A.

(1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

18.

Schumacher

R.M.

Gentner

(1988). Transfer of training as analogical mapping. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18, 592–599.

19.

Smilowitz

(1996). The effective use of metaphors in user interface design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. New Mexico State University.

20.

Young

R. M.

(1983). Surrogates and mappings: two kinds of conceptual models for interactive devices. In Gentner

Stevens

A.L.

(Eds.) Mental models (pp. 35–52). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

The Psychologies of Human-Computer Interaction: An Integrative Approach

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References