A Comparison of Touch,Manual,and Head Controllers for Cursor Movement

Abstract

Three different cursor control techniques were used by subjects in a target designation and assignment task. A touch control, a manual control, and a head control technique were investigated. Subjects designated and assigned either individual targets or target groups displayed on a tactical situation format. Speed and accuracy data were collected to determine which of the techniques provided the pilot with the best performance. Results indicated that the touch screen controller allowed for the best performance. Designating groups of targets also resulted in faster times when compared with designating individual targets. These findings are consistent with the results from previous studies and have a significant bearing on the design and implementation of subsystem control mechanisms used in single-seat and multi-crew civilian and military aircraft.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Buck

(1980). Motor performance in relation to control-display gain and target width. In Ergonomics, 23(6). 579–589. Taylor and Francis Ltd.

Calhoun

G. L.

Janson

W. P.

Arbak

C. J.

(1986). Use of eye control to select switches. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Campbell

J. L.

Rogers

S. P.

(1993). Determining the merit and feasibility of a helmet-tracked cursor control system for use in high-performance aircraft. Volume 1: Critical Human Factors Issues and Combat Mission Operational Requirements. Santa Barbara, CA: Anacapa Sciences, Inc.

Curry

D. G.

Reising

J. M.

Zenyuh

J. P.

(1985). Target designation by speech, joystick, and touch control: format design implications. In Proceedings of the National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (pp. 923–928). Dayton, OH: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

Liggett

K. K.

Benson

M. J.

Solz

T. J.

Reising

J. M.

(1995). An examination of cursor control techniques to designate targets on a cockpit map display. In Proceedings of SPIE's 1995 Symposium on OE/Aerospace Sensing and Dual Use Photonics. Bellingham, WA: SPIE.

Liggett

K. K.

Reising

J. M.

Beam

D. J.

Hartsock

D. C.

(1993). The use of aiding techniques and continuous cursor controllers to designate targets in 3-D space. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 11–15). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Osga

G. A.

(1991). Using enlarged target area and constant visual feedback to aid cursor positioning tasks. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting (pp. 369–373). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Rogers

S. P.

Spiker

V. A.

Fisher

S. C.

(1996). Fighter cockpit precision cursor control (Final Report from Contract F33615-94-C-3805). Santa Barbara, CA: Anacapa Sciences, Inc.

Solz

T. J.

Reising

J. M.

Barry

T. P.

Hartsock

D. C.

(1996). Voice and aided hand trackers to designate targets in 3-D space. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Symposium. Bellingham, WA: SPIE.