Canonical Correlation Analysis of Data on Human-Automation Interaction

Abstract

Canonical correlation analysis is a type of multivariate linear statistical analysis, first described by Hotelling (1935), which is used in a wide range of disciplines to analyze the relationships between multiple independent and multiple dependent variables. We argue that canonical correlation analysis is the method of choice for use with many kinds of datasets encountered in human factors research, including field-study data, part-task and full-mission simulation data, and flight-recorder data. Although canonical correlation analysis is documented in standard textbooks and is available in many statistical computing packages, there are some technical and interpretive problems which prevent its routine use by human factors practitioners. These include problems of computation, interpretation, statistical significance, and treatment of discrete variables. In this paper we discuss these problems and suggest solutions to them. We illustrate the problems and their solutions based on our experience in using canonical correlation in the analysis of a field study of crew-automation interaction in commercial aviation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cliff

(1987). Analyzing multivariate data. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Degani

(1996). Modeling human-machine systems: On modes, error, and patterns of interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology.

Degani

Kirlik

(1995). Modes in human-automation interaction: Initial observations about a modeling approach. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Conference (pp. 3443–3450). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Degani

Shafto

Kirlik

(1995). Mode usage in automated cockpits: Some initial observations. In Sheridan

T. B.

(Ed.), Proceedings of the International Federation of Automatic Control; Man-Machine Systems (IFAC-MMS) Conference (pp. 401–407). Boston, MA: IFAC.

Edgington

E.S.

(1987). Randomization tests (second edition). New York: Marcel Dekker.

Efron

Tibshirani

R.J.

(1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall.

Griswold

R.E.

Griswold

M.T.

(1996). The Icon programming language (third edition). San Jose, CA: Peer-to-Peer Publications.

Hotelling

(1935). The most predictable criterion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 139–142.

Jardine

Sibson

(1971). Mathematical taxonomy. New York: Wiley.

10.

Koeckler

(1994). Numerical methods and scientific computing: Using software libraries for problem solving. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

11.

McKeon

J.J.

(1965). Canonical analysis: Some relations between canonical correlation, factor analysis, discriminant function analysis, and scaling theory. Psychometric Monographs, No. 13.

12.

Simon

J.L.

Bruce

(1991). Probability and statistics the resampling way. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.