This paper reviewed Human Factors expert testimony after the Supreme Court decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993). Daubert (1993) set a new standard for Experts testifying in federal courts. Failure of a Human Factors expert to meet the Daubert standard will result in the exclusion of the expert's testimony. Court cases after Daubert (1993) were reviewed and principles were applied which resulted in acceptance or rejection of the Human Factors expert testimony. Considerations for Human Factors professionals testifying in court are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aparacio v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co., 874 F. Supp. 154, (N.D. OH 1994).
2.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
3.
Dennis v. Pertec Computer Co., 927 F. Supp. 156, (D. N. J 1996).
4.
Diaz v. Johnson Matthey, Inc., 893 F. Supp. 358, (D. N. J. 1995).
5.
EEOC v. Atlas Paper Box, 868 F. 2d 1487, (6th Cir. 1989).
6.
Federal Rules of Evidence for United States Courts and Magistrates. (1975). St. Paul, MN: West.
7.
Fontenot v. Digital Equipment Corp., 1996U.S. Dist. Lexis 13101. (N.D. IL, 1996).
8.
Gier v. Educational Service Unit No. 16, 66 F.3d 940, (8th Cir. 1995).
9.
Hopkins v. NCR Corp., 1994U.S. Dist. Lexis 17273. (M.D. LA 1994).
10.
MartinB.J.ArmstrongT. J.FoulkeJ. A.SivakumaranN.KlinenbergE.SerinaE.RempelD. (1996). Keyboard Reaction Force and Finger Flexor Electromyograms during Computer Keyboard Work. Human Factors, 38(4), 654–664.
11.
Melendez v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co., 79 F. 3d 661, (7th Cir. 1995).
Reiff v. Convergent Technologies (1997). 1997 U.S. Dist. Lexis 2528. (D.N.J. 1997).
14.
Riley v. Warren Manufacturing, Inc. (1997). 688 A. 2d 221; (1997).
15.
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc. (1987). Principles for the Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures. (Third Edition) College Park, MD: Author.
16.
Sparks v. Conrail, 1995U.S. Dist. Lexis 6234. (E.D. PA 1995).
17.
Spears v. Unisys Corporation, 1995U.S. Dist. Lexis 8745. (E.D. MI 1995).
18.
Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (1985). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19.
Surace v. Caterpillar, Inc., 1995U.S. Dist. Lexis 6683; (CH Product Liability Report p. 14, 220). (E.D. PA 1995).
20.
Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (1978). Federal Register, 43, 38290–38309.
