A theory of system performance measures that permits evaluation of the effects on mission performance of the performance of each constituent mission task was extended to tactical data processing systems. This system performance permits the evaluation of both teams and individual team members on either a mission or any portion of a mission, including specific tasks or task types.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakerJ. D.The training effectiveness of simulation. Paper presented at the Society of Applied Learning Technology: First International Technology Congress and Exposition, Washington, D. C., July 1976.
2.
ConnellyE. M., KnoopP. A., BourneF. J., & JoentalD. G.Computer-aided generation of performance measures for man-machine systems applied to automated training. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Man-Machine Systems, St. John's College, Cambridge, England, September 1969.
3.
ConnellyE. M., KnoopP. A., BourneF. J., & LoentalD. G.Computer-aided generation of performance measures for man-machine systems. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, October 1974.
4.
ConnellyE. M., ZeskindR. M., & ChubbG. P.Development of a continuous performance measure for manual control. (Final Report on Contract No. F33615-75-C-5099, AMRL-TR-76-24). June 1977.
5.
ConnellyE. M.Research on manned system design using operator measures and criteria (OMAC) data. (Final Report on Contract No. N00014-75-C-0810, Tech Report No. OTR-62-77-2). July 1977.
6.
ConnellyE. M., ComeauR. F., & SteinheiserF.Team performance measures for computerized systems. (Final Tech Report for ARI Contract No. MDA903-79-C-0274) 1981 (in press).
7.
Defense Science Board.Summary report of the task force on training technology.Washington, D. C.Office of Director of Defense Research and Engineering, 22 February 1976.
8.
RizzoW. A.Team training. NAVTRADEV P-1300-64, Navy Training Analysis and Evaluation, 1975.
9.
WagnerH.Team training and evaluation strategies: a state of the art review. (HumRRO Special Report SR-ED-76-11). Alexandria, Virginia: Human Resources Research Organization, June 1976.