Two experiments assess the validity of the Harris Inspection test as a selection tool for industrial inspectors. The test is a short, two-part paper-and-pencil test which requires subjects to inspect a series of symbols for defects. Harris validated the test using inspectors who inspected four different types of electronic equipment. These studies fail to duplicate his findings. The data indicate that the Harris Test is not a valid selection test for industrial inspectors.
ColquhounW. P.Temperment, inspection efficiency, and time of day. Ergonomics, 1960, 3, 377–378.
3.
ColquhounW. P., and CorcoranD. W. I.The effects of time of day and social isolation on the relationship between temperment and performance. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 3, 226–231.
4.
CzajaS. J.Varying training techniques across age span for a visual inspection task. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1980.
5.
FinnJ. D.User's Guide. MULTIVARIANCE: univariate and multivariate analysis of variance, covariance and regression.National Educational Resources, Chicago, 1978.
6.
GallweyT. J.Visual inspection for several fault types and its predictors. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1980.
7.
HarrisD. H.Development and validation of an aptitude test for inspectors of electronic equipment. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 1964, 2, 29–35.
8.
MonkT. H., and BrownB.The effect of target surround density on visual search performance. Human Factors, 1975, 17, 356–360.
9.
SchumanJ. T.The value of aptitude tests for factory workers in the aircraft engine and aircraft factory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1945, 29, 156–163.
10.
TiffinJ., and RogersH. B.The selection and training of inspectors. Personnel, 1941, 18, 14–31.
11.
WienerE. L.Individual and group differences in inspection. In DruryC. G., and FoxJ. G. (Eds.) Human reliability in quality control.London: Taylor and Francis Ltd., 1975.
