Preferred Height and Angle Settings of Crt and Keyboard for a Display Station Input Task

Abstract

This study investigated the display station physical adjustments preferred by a sample of visual display terminal (VDT) operators preselected to span the 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles in physical stature with respect to United States or Japanese anthropometric surveys. Thirty-seven operators were taken individually through a step-by-step sequence to determine their preferred adjustments of seat height, keyboard height and slope angle, and CRT height and tilt angle. Each operator then performed a brief transcription task.

Measurements corresponding to the final preferred height and angle adjustments do not agree with some currently evolving German ergonomic display station requirements. In addition, intermeasure correlations strongly suggest that “flat” (low slope angle) keyboards are inappropriate for operators who select low seat heights and are short in stature.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alden

D. G.

, Daniels

R. W.

, and Kanarick

A. F.

Keyboard design and operation: A review of the major issues. Human Factors, 1972, 14, 275–293.

Bronson

Video display units blamed for anxiety, pains, and strains. Wall Street Journal. June 16, 1980.

Cakir

, Hart

D. J.

, and Stewart

T. F. M.

Visual display terminals. New York: John Wiley, 1980. pp. 126, 162.

Eisen

D. J.

VDT beefs real, Milan conference told. The Guild Reporter, Washington, DC. April 11, 1980.

Galitz

W. O.

CRT keyboard human factors evaluation. UNIVAC, Systems Application Engineering, Roseville DPD, March 1965.

Hertzberg

H. T. E.

, Daniels

G. S.

, and Churchill

, 1954. (Data tables presented in Roebuck, J.A., Kroemer, K. H. E., and Thomson, W. G. Engineering anthropometry methods. New York: John Wiley, 1975. Appendix B)

NASA. Anthropometric source book, volume 1: Anthropometry for designers. NASA reference publication 1024. Yellow Springs, Ohio: Webb Associates, 1978.(a)

NASA. Anthropometric source book, volume II: A handbook of anthropometric data. NASA reference publication 1024. Yellow Springs, Ohio: Webb Associates, 1978.(b)

Scales

E. M.

, and Chapanis

The effect on performance of tilting the toll-operator's keyset. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1954, 38, 452–456.

10.

Smith

M. J.

, Stammerjohn

L. W.

, Cohen

B. G. F.

, and Lalich

N. R.

Job stress in video display operations. In Grandjean

, and Vigliani

(Eds.) Ergonomic aspects of visual display terminals. London: Taylor & Francis, 1980, 201–210.

11.

Springer

T. J.

Visual display units in the office environment: Blessings or curses? In Poydar

H. R.

(Ed.) Proceedings of the symposium: Human factors and industrial design in consumer products. Medford, MA: Tufts University Department of Engineering Design, 1980, 144-154.

12.

Stewart

T. F. M.

Practical experiences in solving VDU ergonomics problems. In Grandjean

, and Vigliani

(Eds.) Ergonomic aspects of visual display terminals. London: Taylor & Francis, 1980, 233–240.

13.

TCA. Safety regulations for display workplaces in the office sector. No. ZH 1/618. Trade Cooperative Association, Central Office for Accident Prevention and Industrial Medicine. Langwartweg 103, D-5300 Bonn 1. Edition 10.1980, Section 4.3.2.