Presented are the results of a systematic analysis and extension of the human design considerations for dot-matrix displays. A brief overview of some CRT literature is given and extended to address the design of distance viewed (large screen) displays. The results of some recent studies which address large screen display design are discussed. Recommendations are given for the research needed to improve large screen display design.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BibermanL. M. (editor), Perception of Displayed Information.New York: Plenum Press, 1973.
2.
CarelW. L., McGrathJ., HershbergerM. L., and HermanJ. A.Design Criteria for Airborne Map Displays, Volume 1: Methodology and Research Results. Joint Army-Navy Aircraft Instrumentation Research Final Report, Contract No. N00014-71-C-0070, NR 213-075, 1974.
3.
DudekC. L., HuchingsonR. D., WilliamsR. D., KoppaR. J., and StocktonW. R.Human Factors Design of Dynamic Visual and Auditory Displays for Metropolitan Traffic Management, Federal Highway Administration No. DOT-FH-11-9459, August 1979.
4.
EllisF., BurrellG. J., WharfJ., and HawkinsT.D.F.The Format and Color of Small Matrix Displays for Use in High Ambient Illumination. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, 1974, 106–107.
5.
GouldJ. D., Visual Factors in the Design of Computer-Controlled CRT Displays. Human Factors, 10, 1968, 359–376.
6.
GrovesH. T., Packaging of Multi-Character LED Modules With Self-Contained Driving Circuitry. Journal of the Society for Information Display, 1973, 10, 4, 11–19.
7.
HuchingsonR. D., WilliamsR. D., ReidT. G., and DudekC. L.Formatting, Message Load, Sequencing Method and Presentation Rate for Computer Generated Displays. Human Factors Vol. 23(5), October 1981.
8.
MaddoxM. E., BurnetteJ. T., and GutmannJ. C.Font Comparisons for 5 × 7 Dot-Matrix Characters. Human Factors, 1977, 19, 89–93.
9.
PlathD. W.The Readability of Segmented and Conventional Numerals. Human Factors, 1970, 12, 493–497.
10.
SempleC. A.Jr., HeapyR. J., ConwayE. J.Jr., and BurnetteK. T.Analysis of Human Factors Data for Electronic Flight Display Systems. Final Report, Contract Number F33615-70-C-1132 Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, 1971.
11.
ShurtleffD., MarsettaM., and ShowmanD.Studies of Display Symbol Legibility, IX: The Effects of Resolution, Size, and Viewing Angle on Legibility. ESD-TR-65-411 (AD 633 833), Electronic Systems Division, Air Force Systems Command, Hanscom Field, Mass., May 1966.
12.
VanderkolkR. J., HermanJ. A., and HershbergerM. L.Dot Matrix Display Symbology Study.Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, USAF-AFFDL-TR-75-72 (AD-016-470) July 1975.
13.
VartebedianA. G.Effects of Parameters of Symbol Formation on Legibility. Journal of the Society for Information Display, 1970, 7, (5), 23–26.
14.
WilliamsR. D.Font and Matrix Size for Distance Viewed Dot-Matrix Displays. A Dissertation at Texas A&M University, December 1980.
