This study evaluated the utility of a binary classification task in assessing the neurotoxic effects of elemental mercury. Twenty-six mercury cell chlor-alkali workers were tested in order to study the dose-response relationship between mercury exposure and the stage-specific measures provided by this reaction-time paradigm. Two of the stages studied, short-term memory scanning and binary decision, were found to be adversely affected by chronic exposure to mercury.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersT.FozardJ.LillyquistT. “Effects of Age Upon Retrieval from Short-Term Memory.” Developmental Psychology, 6(2):214–217, 1972.
2.
CavanaghJ. “Relation Between the Immediate Memory Span and the Memory Search Rate.” Psychological Review, 79(6):525–530, 1972.
3.
ComstockB. S. “A Review of Psychological Measures Relevant to Central Nervous System Toxicity with Specific Reference to Solvent Inhalation.” Clinical Toxicology, 11:317–324, 1977.
4.
LangolfG.ChaffinD.HendersonR.WhittleH. “Evaluation of Workers Exposed to Elemental Mercury Using Quantitative Tests of Tremor and Neuromuscular Functions.” American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 39:976–984, 1978.
5.
SmithP.Short-Term Memory Scanning is Related to Memory Span and Mercury Exposure. Ph. D. Dissertation, The University of Michigan, 1979.
6.
SmithP.LangolfG. “The Effects of Mercury Exposure on Short-Term Memory Scanning.” In preparation, 1980a.
7.
SmithP.LangolfG. “The Effects of Mercury Exposure on Short-Term Memory Span.” In preparation, 1980b.
8.
SternbergS. “High Speed Scanning in Human Memory.” Science, 153:652–654, 1966.
9.
SternbergS. “The Discovery of Processing Stages: Extensions of Donders' Method.” Acta Psychologica, 30:276–315, 1969.
10.
SternbergS. “Memory Scanning: New Findings and Current Controversies.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27:1–32, 1975.
11.
WelfordA.Fundamentals of Skill. London: Metheun and Co., Ltd., 1968.
