When a task is practiced, its correlation with an external measure may increase, decrease, or remain the same, to take only linear possibilities into account. If the correlation increases, the task is said to converge on the external measure; if it decreases, the task diverges from the external measure. This simple notion has many applications, some of them entailing important theoretical consequences. The present paper discusses three of these applications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ. A.The prediction of performance at advanced stages of training in a complex psychomotor task. USAF Human Resources Research Center, 1953, Research Bulletin No. 53–49.
2.
AlvaresK. M.HulinC. L.Two explanations of temporal changes in ability-skill relationships: A literature review and theoretical analysis. Human Factors, 1972, 14, 295–308.
3.
AlvaresK. M.HulinC. L.An experimental evaluation of a temporal decay in the prediction of performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1973, 9, 169–185.
4.
BurosO.Seventh mental measurement yearbook. Highland Park, New Jersey: Gryphon Press, 1972.
5.
FleishmanE. A.Abilities at different stages of practice in rotary pursuit performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960, 60, 162–171.
6.
FleishmanE. A.HempolW. E.Jr.Changes in factor structure of a complex psychomotor test as a function of practice. USAF Human Resources Research Center, 1953, Research Bulletin No. 53–68.
7.
HumphreysL. G.The fleeting nature of the prediction of college academic success. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1968, 59, 375–380.
8.
JonesM. B.A two-process theory of individual differences in motor learning. Psychological Review, 1970, 77, 353–360. (a).
9.
JonesM. B.Rate and terminal processes in skill acquisition. American Journal of Psychology, 1970, 83, 222–236. (b).
10.
JonesM. B.Differential processes in acquisition. In BilodeauE. A.BilodeauI. Med. (Eds.). Principles of skill acquisition. New York: Academic Press, 1969.
11.
JonesM. B.Individual differences. In SingerR. N. (Ed.), The psychomotor domain. Philadelphia: Lee and Febiger, 1972.
12.
JonesM. B.KennedyR. S.BittnerA. C.Jr.Video games and convergence or divergence with practice. Presented at the 7th Psychology in the Department of Defense Symposium, April 16–18, 1980, USAF Academy, Colorado Springs, Colorado.
13.
MischelW.Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley, 1968.
14.
PepperR. L.KennedyR. S.BittnerA. C.Jr.Development of performance evaluation tests for environmental research (PETER): Code substitution test. Presented at the 7th Psychology in the Department of Defense Symposium, April 16–18, 1980, USAF Academy, Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, Colorado.
15.
PintnerR.Intelligence testing. New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1923.
16.
ReynoldsB.Correlation between two psychomotor tasks as a function of distribution of practice on the first. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952, 43, 341–348.
17.
WechslerD.The measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence. Baltimore: Williamson and Wilson, 1958.
18.
WoodrowH.Factors in improvement with practice. Journal of Psychology, 1939, 7, 55–70.
