The principal and most influential theories of vigilance, categorized as learning theories, neurological models, psychophysical models, and information processing models, are reviewed and evaluated. It is pointed out that often their differences are more real than apparent and that no one of them accounts for all of the current data.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsJ. A.Vigilance in the detection of low-intensity visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1956, 52, 204–208.
2.
BakerC. H.Attention to visual displays during a vigilance task. II. Maintaining the level of vigilance. British Journal of Psychology, 1959, 50, 30–36.
3.
BinfordJ. R.LoebM.Changes within and over repeated sessions in criterion and effective sensitivity in an auditory vigilance task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 72, 339–345.
4.
BroadbentD. E.Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon, 1958.
5.
BroadbentD. E.Decision and stress. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
6.
BroadbentD. E.GregoryM.Vigilance considered as a statistical decision. British Journal of Psychology, 1963(a), 54, 309–323.
7.
BroadbentD. E.GregoryM.Division of attention and the decision theory of signal detection. Proceeding of the Royal Society, B, 1963(b), 158, 222–231.
8.
CaldeiraJ. D.Parametric assumptions of some “nonparametric” measures of sensory efficiency. Human Factors, 1980, 22, 119–120.
9.
CoatesG. D.LoebM.AlluisiE. A.Influence of observing strategies and stimulus variables on watchkeeping performance. Ergonomics, 1972, 15, 379–386.
10.
ColquhounW. P.BaddeleyA. D.The role of pretest expectancies in vigilance decrement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964, 68, 156–160.
11.
CraigA.Broadbent and Gregory revisited: Vigilance and statistical decision. Human Factors, 1977, 19, 25–36.
12.
CraigA.Is the vigilance decrement simply an adjustment toward probability matching? Human Factors, 1978, 20, 441–446.
13.
DesmedtJ.Neurophysiological mechanisms controlling acoustic input. In RasmussenG. L.WindleW. F. (Eds.) Neural mechanisms of the auditory and vestibular systems. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1960.
14.
EganJ. P.GreenbergG. Z.SchulmanA. I.Operating characteristics, signal detectability, and the method of free response. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1961, 33, 993–1007.
15.
FiskA. D.SchneiderW.Controlled and automatic processing during tasks requiring sustained attention: A new approach to vigilance. Human Attention Research Laboratory, Psychology Department, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois, Report No. 8006, 1980.
16.
FrankmannJ. P.AdamsJ. A.Theories of vigilance. Psychological Bulletin, 1962, 59, 257–272.
17.
HatfieldJ. L.SoderquistJ. R.Practice effects and signal detection indices in an auditory vigilance task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1969, 46, 1458–1463.
18.
HawkesG. R.MeighanT. W.AlluisiE. A.Vigilance in complex task situations. Journal of Psychology, 1964, 58, 223–236.
19.
HebbD. O.Drives and the C. N. S. (conceptual nervous system). Psychological Review, 1955, 62, 242–254.
20.
Hernandez-PeónR.Reticular mechanisms of sensory control. In RosenblithW. A. (Ed.) Sensory communication. New York: M. I. T. Press-Wiley, 1961.
JerisonH. J.PickettR. M.Vigilance: The importance of the elicited observing rate. Science, 1964, 143, 970–971.
23.
KirkR. E.HechtE.Maintenance of vigilance by programmed noise. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1963, 16, 553–560.
24.
KulpR. A.AlluisiE. A.Effects of stimulus-response on watchkeeping performance and choice reactions. Perception and Psychophysics, 1967, 2, 511–515.
25.
LoebM.On the analysis and interpretation of vigilance: Some remarks on two recent articles by Craig. Human Factors, 1978, 20, 447–451.
26.
LoebM.BinfordJ. R.Vigilance for auditory changes as a function of preliminary knowledge of results and confidence levels. Human Factors, 1964, 6, 445–450.
27.
MackworthJ. F.Vigilance and habituation. London: Penguin, 1969.
28.
MackworthJ. F.TaylorM. M.The d' measure of sensitivity in vigilance-like situations. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1963, 17, 302–325.
29.
MackworthN. H.Researches on the measurement of human performance. London: H. M. Stationery Office, 1950.
30.
MackworthN. H.KaplanI. T.MetlayW.Eye movements during vigilance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1964, 18, 397–402.
31.
MalmoR. B.Activation: A neuropsychological dimension. Psychological Review, 1959, 66, 367–386.
32.
McGrathJ. J.Irrelevant stimulation and vigilance performance. In BucknerD. N.McGrathJ. J. (Eds.) Vigilance: A symposium. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
33.
MullinJ.CorcoranD. W. J.Interaction of amplitude with circadian variation in auditory vigilance performance. Ergonomics, 1977, 20, 193–200.
34.
O'HanlonJ. F.BeattyJ.Concurrence of electroencephalographic and performance changes during a simulated radar watch and some implications for the arousal theory of vigilance. In MackieR. R. (Ed.) Vigilance Theory, operational performance and physiological correlates. New York: Plenum, 1977.
35.
ParasuramanR.Memory load and event rate control sensitivity decrements in sustained attention. Science, 1979, 205, 924–927.
36.
SchneiderW.ShiffrinR. M.Controlled and automatic human information processing. I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 1977, 84, 1–66.
37.
SchroederS. R.HollandJ. G.Operant control of eye movements during vigilance. Science, 1968, 161, 292–293.
38.
SharplessS.JasperH. H.Habituation of the arousal reaction. Brain, 1956, 79, 655–680.
39.
SwetsJ. A.Signal detection theory applied to vigilance. In MackieR. R. (Ed.) Vigilance. Theory, operational performance, and physiological correlates. New York: Plenum, 1977.
40.
TreismanA.Contextual cues in selective listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960, 12, 242–248.
41.
WarmJ. S.Psychological processes In sustained attention. In MackieR. R. (Ed.) Vigilance. Theory, operational performance, and physiological correlates. New York: Plenum, 1977.
42.
WilkinsonR. T.Interaction of noise with knowledge of results and sleep deprivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 66, 332–337.
43.
WilkinsonR. T.Evoked potentials and signal detections: The influence of slow potentials. Proceedings of the International Evoked Potentials Symposium, Nottingham, England, MTP Press, 1979.
