Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The problem addressed by the study was to explore the feasibility of predicting air-to-ground target acquisition performance with electro-optical systems, based on “real world” data, in terms of specifiable, measureable, sensor image quality characteristics.

The approach was to review flight test and simulator test results, rejecting those which did not permit comparison of different image qualities under similar conditions. The surviving data sets did not, in general, use comparable measures of either image quality or performance. Consequently, a review of the relevant measures of those variables was also made. To the limited extent permitted by the data, it can be stated that (1) poor image quality sets performance limits, and (2) further improvement of adequate imagery results in rapidly diminishing benefits.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramson

Picture Quality: Film vs Television. JSMPTE, Vol. 77, p 613, 1968.

Colyer

. EO and IR Target Acquisition Summary of Field Test Data. Air Force Armament Laboratory, Eglin AFB, FL AFATL-TR-75–74. (Secret) May, 1975.

Decker

P. A.

Warship Identification with EO Imaging Systems. Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, CA, March 1976. NWC TP 5895.

Erickson

R. A.

Line Criteria in Target Acquisition with EO Devices. Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, CA March 1976. NWC TP 5854.

Greening

C. P.

Savage

G. C.

Target Acquisition and Image Quality. Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, CA Sep 1979, NWC TP 6139.

Klingberg

C. L.

. Image Quality and Detection Performance of Military Interpreters. The Boeing Co., Seattle, WA, April 1970.

Lacey

L. A.

Effect of Raster Scan Lines, Image Subtense, and Target Orientation on Aircraft Identification on TV. Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, CA, May 1975. NWC TP 5763.

Rogers

J. G.

Carel

W. L.

, Development of Design Criteria for Sensor Displays. Hughes Aircraft Co., Culver City, CA, Dec 1973.

Rosell

F. A.

Wilson

R. H.

Performance Synthesis - EO Sensors. Air Force Avionics Laboratory, WPAFB, OH, May 1971. AFAL TR-71–137.

10.

Snyder

H. L.

. Visual Search and Image Quality. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, WPAFB, OH, Oct 1974. AMRL TR 73–114.

11.

Task

H. L.

Verona

R. W.

A New Measure of TV Display Quality Relatable to Observer Performance. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, WPAFB, OH, Aug 1976. AMRL TR 76–73.

12.

Task

H. L.

An Evaluation and Comparison of Several Measures of Image Quality for TV Display. Unpublished dissertation, the Optical Sciences Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 1979.

Is Image Quality Important?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References