This presentation explores the idea that training analysts have not fully utilized the rich source of data which can stem from the examination of training programs. Several approaches including individual difference methodology, trainee expectations and training process measures are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartlettC.J.GoldsteinI.L.A validity analysis of employment tests for bus drivers. Training and Educational Research Program, Inc., College Park, MD, 1974.
2.
BrayD.W.CampbellR.J.Selection of salesmen by means of an assessment center. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1968, 52, 36–41.
3.
BrayD.W.GrantD.L.The assessment cen-center in the measurement of potential for for business management. Psychological Monographs, 1966, 80, (17, Whole No. 625).
4.
CampbellJ.P.Personnel training and development. In Annual review of psychology.Palo Alto, California: Annual Reviews, 1971.
5.
FleishmanE.A.On the relationship between abilities, learning, and human performance. American Psychologist, 1972, 27, 1017–1032.
6.
GhisellE.E.The validity of occupational aptitude tests.New York: Wiley, 1966.
7.
GoldsteinI.L.Training: Program development and evaluation.Monterey California: Brooks/Cole, 1974.
8.
GoldsteinI.L.The pursuit of validity in the evaluation of training programs. In GoldsteinI.L. (Ed.), Training: Methodological Considerations and Empirical Approaches. Special Issue Human Factors Journal, 1978, 20, 131–144.
9.
HinrichsJ.R.Comparisons of “real life” assessments of management potential with situational exercises, paper and pencil ability tests, and personality inventories. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969, 53, 425–432.
10.
WanousJ.P.Organizational entry: Newcomers moving from outside to inside. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 601–618.
11.
WeinimontP.F.CampbellJ.P.Signs, samples, and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1968, 52, 372–376.
