Some of the many elements influencing fit in the clothing system are examined in this paper. The general ways that government, industry and consumers have tried to achieve good fit in apparel are outlined. The goal of universal good fit probably will not be achieved with present resources. There is a clear and compelling need for an accurate, representative, and up-to-date measurement description of our population and for a rational, apparel-fit system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AAMA Technical Advisory Committee.Plan ahead: metrication and the U.S. Apparel Industry.Arlington: AAMA, 1975.
2.
BettelheimB.The uses of enchantment: the meaning and importance of fairy tales.New York: Knopf, 1976.
3.
ChurchillT.ChurchillE.LaubachL.McConvilleJ.WhiteR.Anthropometry of Women of the U.S. Army. Report No. 1-Methodological and survey plan; Report No. 2- The basic univariate statistics; Report No. 3- Bivariate frequency tables; Report No. 5- Comparable data for U.S. Army men. Natick, Massachusetts: U.S. Army, Natick Research and Development Command, 1977.
4.
ForziatiF.Clothes that fit. Consumers all: 1965 yearbook of agriculture.Washington: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1965, 341–345.
5.
FourtL.HolliesR.Clothing: comfort and function.New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1970.
6.
HuiskampG.Boot and shoe industry, Encyclopedia Britannica, 1956, 885–886.
7.
ISO.Clothing sizes: towards a rational system of marking. ISO Bulletin, 1974, 5, No. 10.
8.
LowreyW.The importance of good fit. Paper presented at the A-Cut Conference, November, 1977.
9.
O'BrienR.SheltonW.Women's measurements for garment and pattern construction. U.S. Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication No. 454. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1941.
10.
PerraultC.Cinderella or the little glass slipper. Free translation from the French. New York: Charles Scribners Sons, 1954.
RosenC.Artificial intelligence applied to industrial problems, Nova-the mind machines.Boston: WGBH Educational Foundation, March, 1978.
13.
SnyderR.SpencerM.OwingsC.SchneiderL.Physical characteristics of children as related to death and injury for consumer product safety design.Washington: Consumer Product Safety Commission, 1975.
14.
SolingerJ.Apparel manufacturing analysis.New York: Textile Book Service, 1961.
15.
StoudtH.DamonA.McFarlandR.RobertsJ.Height, weight, and selected body dimensions of adults, U.S. 1960–1962, Vital and Health Statistics.11, No. 8, 1965.
16.
StoudtH.Are people still getting bigger-who, where, and how much? SAE Technical paper No. 780280, Detroit, 1978.
17.
U.S. Department of Commerce.National Bureau of Standards. Voluntary Product Standards: PS42–70-Body measurements for the sizing of women's patterns and apparel; PS54–72-Body measurements for the sizing of Girls' Apparel; Proposed TS 221-Body measurements for the sizing of female patterns and apparel. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office. Women's market, Clothes. February 15, 1977, 32–34.
18.
Women's market, Clothes. February 15, 1977, 32–34.
