Recently mandated passive restraint requirements raise the question of how to minimize the possible resistance of the public by putting comfort and convenience requirements into Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. This paper discusses methods for determining potential public complaints and presents some of the problems of writing performance rules that deal with the subjective reactions of the public to discomfort and inconvenience.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PierceB. F.—Sources and Remedies for Restraint System Discomfort and Inconvenience—MAN FACTORS, INC., Report MFI 74–108.
2.
BreedonD.GordonS.—Comfort and Convenience Analysis of Advanced Restraint Systems—NHTSA Tech Rpt. DOT HS-801 712.