A cyclical-feedback systems model is proposed as a format for structuring and utilizing the results of evaluative investigations of organizational change efforts. The issues of internal validity, external validity, research design and results utilization are discussed; and an organizational training evaluation example is presented to demonstrate the feasibility, practicality and potential benefits of the approach.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BunkerK. A.CohenS. L.Evaluating organizational training efforts: Is ignorance really bliss?Training and Development Journal, in press.
2.
BunkerK. A.CohenS. L.The rigors of training evaluation: A discussion and field demonstration. Personnel Psychology, 1977, 30, 525–541.
3.
CampbellJ. P.DunnetteM. D.LawlerE. E.WeickK. E.Managerial behavior, performance and effectiveness. N. Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1970.
4.
EntwisleD. R.Interactive effects of pretesting. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1961, 21, 607–620.
5.
GoldsteinI. L.Training: Program development and evaluation. Belmont, California: Wadsworth, 1975.
6.
HamblinA. C.Evaluation and control of training. London: McGraw Hill, 1974.
7.
KhatenaJ.Teaching disadvantaged preschool children to think creatively with pictures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971, 62, 384–386.
8.
LanaR. E.Pretest sensitization. In RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (Eds), Artifact in behavioral research. N. Y.: Academic Press, 1969.
9.
ParkerT. C.Statistical methods for measuring training results. In CraigR. (Ed), Training and development: A guide to human resources development. N.Y.: McGraw Hill, 1976.
10.
SolomonR. L.An extension of control group design. Psychological Bulletin, 1949, 46, 137–150.
