The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is turning to human factors research to provide support in the development and evaluation of performance and design standards. A review of current standards for the design of fall warning systems reveals several areas where human factors research can substantially contribute to the development of safety standards. The review provides a conceptual framework for future research efforts and describes research needs in the development and validation of visual, auditory and tactile warning systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenT.M.StraubA.L.“Sign Brightness and Legibility.”HRB Bulletin, 127, pp. 1–14, 1955.
2.
AllisonW.W.“How to Foresee Tragic Accidents by Use of the High Potential Accident-Prone Situation Hazard Control Method.”National Safety Congress Transactions, Construction Industry and Public Employee, Vol. 8, 1967.
3.
BlackwellH.R.“Contrast Thresholds of the Human Eye.”J. of the Optical Society of Amer., 36:624, 1946.
4.
BlackwellO.M.BlackwellH.R.“Visual Performance Data for 156 Normal Observers of Various Ages.”Journal of IES, 1(1):3–13, Oct. 1971.
5.
CarpenterP.O.“Problems of Linear Closure at Urban Intersections.”Meva Corp., 2nd Quarterly Progress Report, Contract CPR-11-4201, 1966.
6.
ChaffinD.B.Some Effects of Physical Exertion. Western Electric Monograph, 1972.
7.
ChaffinD.B.MiodonskiR.StobbeT.J.BoydstunL.E.“An Ergonomic Basis for Recommendations Pertaining to Specific Sections of OSHA Standard, 29 CFR Part 1910, Subpart D—Walking and Working Surfaces.” A Report for the DOL/OSHA Directorate of Safety Standards, March 1978.
8.
ChandlerR.A.WoodL.E.LemeshewskyW.A.A Review of Philosophical Consideration in the Development of Radar Brake Systems. Society of Automotive Engineering, Report No. 750086, 1975.
9.
ChristR.E.“Review and Analysis of Color Coding Research for Visual Displays.”Human Factors, 17(6): 542–570, 1975.
10.
CobbP.W.MossF.K.“The Four Variables in the Visual Threshold.”Franklin Institute Journal, 205:831, 1928.
11.
CrawfordA.“The Perception of Light Signals and the Effect of Mixing Flashing and Steady Irrelvant Lights.”Ergonomics, 6:287–294, 1963.
12.
DuganL.Jr., “The Union's Role in Accident Prevention.”Am. Soc. of Saf. Eng. Journ., May 1972.
13.
DewarR.“Permissive Versus Prohibitive Symbols for Regulatory Traffic Control Signs.” Paper Presented at the International Conference on Highway Sign Symbology, Washington, D.C., 1972.
14.
DewarR.E.“The Slash Obscures the Symbol on Prohibitive Traffic Signs.”Human Factors, 18 (3): 253–258, 1976.
15.
DewarR.E.EllisJ.G.MundyG.“Reaction Time as an Index of Traffic Sign Perception.”Human Factors, 18 (4): 381–392, 1976.
16.
DreyfusH.CliftonP.“Visual Communications: A Study of Symbols.”Graphic Science, 12(4):21–26, April 1970.
17.
FineW.T.“Mathematical Evaluation for Controlling Hazards.”J. of Saf. Res., 3:157–166, 1971.
18.
ForbesT.W.“A Method for Analysis of the Effectiveness of Highway Signs.”J. of Applied Psychology, 23, 1939.
19.
ForbesT.W. (ed.). Human Factors in Highway Traffic Safety Research. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1972.
20.
ForbesT.W.“Luminance and Contrast Requirements for Legibility and Visibility of Highway Signs.”Transportation Research Record #562, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1976.
21.
ForbesT.W.HolmesR.S.“Legibility Distances of Highway Destination Signs in Relation to Letter Height, Letter Width, and Reflectorization.”HRB Proceedings, 19:321–335, 1939.
22.
GeratherwholS.J.“Conspicuity of Flashing and Steady Light Signals: I. Variations of Contrast.” Special Report, USAF School of Aviation Medicine, Randolph Field, Texas, April 1951.
23.
HansonD.R.DicksonA.D.“Significant Visual Properties of Some Flourescent Pigments.”Highway Research Record49, pp. 13–29, 1964.
24.
HargroveH.“The Perception and Application of Flashing Lifhts.” National Illumination Committee of Great Britain, Toronto, Univ. of Toronto Press, April 1971.
25.
HarrisC.M.Handbook of Noise Control. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., 1957.
HeinrichH.W.Industrial Accident Prevention. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.
28.
KingL.E.“Glance Legibility—Symbol versus Word Highway Signs.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of Human Factors Society, San Francisco, 1970.
29.
KuntzJ.E.SleightR.B.“Legibility of Numerals: The Optimal Ratio of Height to Stroke Width.”Amer. Journ. of Psych., Vol. 63:567–575, 1950.
30.
LawrenceA.C.“Human Eoror as a Cause of Accident in Gold Mining.”J. of Safety Research, 6(2):78–88, June 1974.
31.
McCormickE.J.Human Factors Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.
32.
MillsF.W.“The Comparative Visibility of Standard Luminous and Non-Luminous Signs.”Public Roads, Vol. 14: 109–128, 1933.
33.
MoonP.SpencerD.D.“Visual Data Applied to Lighting Design.”Journ. of Optical Soc. of Am., Vol. 34:605, 1944.
34.
MourantR.R.LangolfG.D.“Luminance Specifications for Automobile Instrument Panels.”Human Factors, 18(1): 71–84, 1976.
35.
PedersenT.O.Colour and Form as Coding Dimensions in Traffic Signs. Inst. of Transport Economy, Oslo, Norway, 1972.
36.
SmithE.E.EgethH.“Effects of Association Value on Perceptual Search.”J. of Exper. Psych., 71 (5): 687–690, 1966.
37.
StraubA.L.AllenT.M.“Sign Brightness in Relation to Positions, Distance, and Reflectorization.”HRB Bulletin, 146:13–44, 1957.
38.
SurryJ.Industrial Accident Research: A Human Engineering Appraisal. Research Report, University of Toronto, Toronto, 1969.
39.
TarrantsW.E.“Applying Measurement Concepts to the Appraisal of Safety Performance.”Am. Soc. of Saf. Eng. Journ., May 1965.
40.
UhlanerJ.E.“The Effect of Thickness of Stroke on the Legibility of Letters.”Proc. Iowa Academy of Science, Vol. 48:319–324, 1941.
41.
U.S. Coast Guard. Title 46 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Subparts 113, Washington, D.C., 1977.
42.
VanCottH.P.KinkadeR.G.Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design. New York: McGraw-Hill Co., 1963, revised edition, 1972.
43.
WoltmanH.L.Review of Visibility Factors in Roadway Signing. Highway Research Board Special Report #134, Division of Engineering, National Research Council, National Academy of Science, National Academy of Engineering, Washington, D.C., 1973.
44.
WoodsD.L.RowanN.J.JohnsonJ.H.“A Summary Report: Significant Points from the Diagnostic Field Studies.”Texas Tranportation Institute, Texas A & M Univ., College Station, Res. Rept. 606–4, 1970.
