This paper reviews work which has investigated the relationship between the amount of information available to a decision maker and the quality of the resulting decision. Consideration is also given to research into the strategies employed by decision makers to cope with information overload. Some recent empirical results are presented which indicate that one must carefully distinguish between the amount of information and the amount of data given to the decision maker.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BirnbaumM.H., The devil rides again: correlation as an index of fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 79, 239–242.
2.
DawesR.M.CorriganB., Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81, 95–106.
3.
DorrisA.L.SadoskyT.L.ConnollyT., Varying data and information in a decision making task. Ergonomics, in press.
4.
EinhornH.J., The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 73, 221–230.
5.
EinhornH.J., Use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models as a function of task and amount of information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1971, 6, 1–27.
6.
GoldenM., Some effects of combining psychological tests on clinical inferences. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1968, 28, 440–446.
7.
HammerC. H.RingelS.The effects of amount of information provided and feedback results on decision making efficiency. Human Factors, 1965, 7, 513–519.
8.
HuntW.A.WalkerR.E., Validity of diagnostic judgment as a function of amount of test information: Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1966, 22, 154–155.
9.
NystedtL.MagnussonD., Predictive efficiency as a function of amount of information. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1972, 7, 441–450.
10.
OskampS., Over-confidence in case-study judgments. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1965, 29, 261–265.
11.
ShepardR.N., On subjectively optimum selection among multi-attribute alternatives. Human Judgments and Optimality, ShellyW.M.BryanG.L., editors. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1964.
12.
TverskyA.KahnemanD., Judgment under uncertainty: heauristics and biases. Science, 1974, 185, 1124–1131.
13.
WrightP.The harassed decision maker: time pressures, distractions and the use of evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 555–561.
