This paper describes a cognitive task analysis (CTA) for developing design recommendations to inform the design of a tool that supports interdisciplinary research using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). The Generative Embeddings Network-based Semantic Inference and Search (GENESIS) prototype is being developed to enable researchers to explore and understand fields of knowledge beyond their areas of specialization. CTA findings include a task diagram outlining three main tasks of interdisciplinary research (information seeking, integration, and creation), cognitive requirements associated with each task, and design recommendations for integrating GenAI into the interdisciplinary research process.
BaumS. D. (2021). Artificial interdisciplinarity: Artificial intelligence for research on complex societal problems. Philosophy & Technology, 34, 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00416-5
2.
ChenH-RHuangJ-G. (2012). Exploring learner attitudes toward web-based recommendation learning service system for interdisciplinary applications. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 89–100. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.15.2.89
3.
ChenY.DaamenT. A.HeurkensE. W. T. M.VerheulW. J. (2020). Interdisciplinary and experiential learning in urban development management education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30, 919–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09541-5
4.
CrandallB.KleinG.A.HoffmanR.R. (2006). Working Minds: A practitioner’s guide to cognitive task analysis. MIT Press.
5.
FergussonL. (2022). Learning by. . . knowledge and skills acquisition through work-based learning and research. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 14(2), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-12-2021-0065
6.
HuiB.ZhangL.ZhouX.WenX.NianY. (2022). Personalized recommendation system based on knowledge embedding and historical behavior. Applied Intelligence, 52, 954–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02363-w
7.
JiaY.ZhouB.ZhengX. (2021). A curriculum integrating STEAM and maker education promotes pupils’ learning motivation, self-efficacy, and interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 725525. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725525
8.
Jimenez GutierrezB.ShuY.GuY.YasunagaM.SuY. (2024). HippoRAG: Neurobiologically inspired long-term memory for large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37, 59532–59569.
9.
LupoS. M.BerryA.ThackerE.SawyerA.MerrittJ. (2019). Rethinking text sets to support knowledge building and interdisciplinary learning. The Reading Teacher, 73(4), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1869
10.
MaY.OuyangR.LongX.GaoZ.LaiT.FanC. (2023). DORIS: Personalized course recommendation system based on deep learning. PloS One, 18(6), e0284687. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284687
11.
MilitelloL. G.HuttonR. J. B. (1998). Applied Cognitive Task Analysis (ACTA): A practitioner’s toolkit for understanding cognitive task demands. Ergonomics Special Issue: Task Analysis, 41(11), 1618–1641
12.
PengJ.XuD.LeeR.XuS.ZhouY.WangK. (2022). Expediting knowledge acquisition by a web framework for Knowledge Graph Exploration and Visualization (KGEV): Case studies on COVID-19 and human phenotype ontology. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 22, 147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01848-z
13.
RahayuN. W.FerdianaR.KusumawardaniS. S. (2023). A systematic review of learning path recommender systems. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 7437–7460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11460-3
14.
SmithA.GoodwinD.MortM.PopeC. (2003). Expertise in practice: An ethnographic study exploring acquisition and use of knowledge in anesthesia. British Journal of Anesthesia, 91(3), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeg180
15.
TanS. C.ChanC.BielaczycK.MaL.ScardamaliaM.BereiterC. (2021). Knowledge building: Aligning education with needs for knowledge creation in the digital age. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2243–2266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09914-x
