This study explores the feasibility and design preferences of a virtual reality (VR) intervention that aims to improve treatment preparedness among newly diagnosed lung cancer patients. We collected qualitative interviews from N = 10 providers and N = 20 lung cancer patients using purposive sampling. We collected feedback on treatment preparedness barriers, and VR preferences. We analyzed the data using an inductive thematic approach. Nearly all patients were comfortable with technology (90%) and VR decision-support (75%), with 35% reporting direct VR experience. Two primary themes emerged: Content, where both groups prioritized clear, tailored education on lung cancer stages, biomarkers, and treatment pathways; and Format and Delivery, with strong preferences for immersive, video-based VR modules under 30 min, modular navigation, home-based use, and accessibility features like subtitles.
Conclusions: A tailored, video-based VR intervention with modular, home-based modules and accessibility features meets patient and provider preferences. These insights guided the EveryBreathMatters prototype.
AndersenM. R.SweetE.LoweK. A.StandishL. J.DrescherC. W.GoffB. A. (2012). Involvement in decision-making about treatment and ovarian cancer survivor quality of life. Gynecologic Oncology, 124(3), 465–470.
3.
CampbellJ. K.EricksonJ. M. (2023). Interactive health literacy and symptom self-management in patients with lung cancer: A critical realist analysis. Cancer Nursing, 10.1097.
4.
ChiricoA.LucidiF.De LaurentiisM.MilaneseC.NapoliA.GiordanoA. (2016). Virtual reality in health system: beyond entertainment. A mini-review on the efficacy of VR during cancer treatment. Journal of cellular physiology, 231(2), 275–287.
5.
ChristiansenK.BuswellL.FadeluT. (2023). A systematic review of patient education strategies for oncology patients in low-and middle-income countries. The Oncologist, 28(1), 2–11.
6.
EvansN.IIIGrendaT.AlvarezN. H.OkusanyaO. T. (2021). Narrative review of socioeconomic and racial disparities in the treatment of early stage lung cancer. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 13(6), 3758.
7.
HahnR. A. (2021). What is a social determinant of health? Back to basics. Journal of Public Health Research, 10(4), 2324.
8.
HuangC.-C.KuoH.-P.LinY.-E.ChenS.-C. (2019). Effects of a web-based health education program on quality of life and symptom distress of initially diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Cancer Education, 34, 41–49.
JohnsonA. M.HinesR. B.JohnsonJ. A.IIIBayaklyA. R. (2014). Treatment and survival disparities in lung cancer: the effect of social environment and place of residence. Lung Cancer, 83(3), 401–407.
11.
KneuertzP. J.JagadeshN.PerkinsA.FitzgeraldM.Moffatt-BruceS. D.MerrittR. E.D’SouzaD. M. (2020). Improving patient engagement, adherence, and satisfaction in lung cancer surgery with implementation of a mobile device platform for patient reported outcomes. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 12(11), 6883.
12.
KoayK.SchofieldP.GoughK.BuchbinderR.RischinD.BallD.CorryJ.OsborneR. H.JeffordM. (2013). Suboptimal health literacy in patients with lung cancer or head and neck cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer, 21, 2237–2245.
13.
KoayK.SchofieldP.JeffordM. (2012). Importance of health literacy in oncology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 8(1), 14–23.
14.
LeeS. H.LeeK. H.ChangS. J. (2018). Do health literacy and self-care behaviours affect quality of life in older persons with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy?International Journal of Nursing Practice, 24(6), e12691.
15.
MonestimeS.RigneyM.PhippsN.CarlsonC.AlongiT.ReddingM.KingJ. C. (2023). Health inequities across the lung cancer care continuum in ten marginalized populations: a narrative review. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 15(11), 6345.
16.
MossJ. L.PintoC. N.SrinivasanS.CroninK. A.CroyleR. T. (2020). Persistent poverty and cancer mortality rates: an analysis of county-level poverty designations. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 29(10), 1949–1954.
17.
PittaraM.MatsangidouM.StylianidesK.PetkovN.PattichisC. S. (2020). Virtual reality for pain management in cancer: a comprehensive review. IEEE Access, 8, 225475–225489.
18.
SansoniM.MalighettiC.RivaG. (2022). Psychological and educational interventions among cancer patients: A systematic review to analyze the role of immersive virtual reality for improving patients’ well-being. In De PaolisL. T.BourdotP. (Eds.), XR Salento 2022: International Conference on Extended Reality (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 13443, pp. 199–214). Springer.
19.
StewartD. W.AdamsC. E.CanoM. A.Correa-FernándezV.LiY.WatersA. J.WetterD. W.VidrineJ. I. (2013). Associations between health literacy and established predictors of smoking cessation. American Journal of Public Health, 103(7), e43–e49.
20.
TarverW. L.HaggstromD. A. (2019). The use of cancer-specific patient-centered technologies among underserved populations in the United States: systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(4), e10256.
21.
van der KrukS. R.ZielinskiR.MacDougallH.Hughes-BartonD.GunnK. M. (2022). Virtual reality as a patient education tool in healthcare: a scoping review. Patient Education and Counseling, 105(7), 1928–1942.
22.
WithrowD. R.FreedmanN. D.GibsonJ. T.YuM.NápolesA. M.BerringtondeGonzálezA.ShielsM. S. (2021). Leading cancers contributing to educational disparities in cancer mortality in the US, 2017. Cancer Causes & Control, 32, 1193–1196.
