This study investigated whether Electronic Flight Bags (EFBs) affect pilots’ situation awareness (SA) compared to paper-based flight bags. The research involved 38 participants from an aeronautical university, who tested both display devices in a flight simulator under various conditions using the Situation Present Assessment Method to test SA. Results showed that when using EFB, participants performed better on response accuracy, with no significant differences in response times. The study concluded that EFBs do not impair situation awareness, though participants’ prior EFB experience may influence results. Future research should include a more diverse range of participants, particularly those who use paper exclusively.
AteşS. S. (2017). Electronic flight bag in the operation of airline companies: application in Turkey. Computer Science and Information Technology, 5(4), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.13189/csit.2017.050402
2.
BabbT. A. (2017). Professional pilot commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) EFB usage, policies, and reliability. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 4(1), 1159. https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2017.1159
3.
BhardwajP.PurdyC. (2019). Safety and human factors for electronic flight bag usage in general aviation [Conference session]. 2019 IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON). https://doi.org/10.1109/naecon46414.2019.9057898
4.
BurnsK. J.BonacetoC. A.EstesS. L.HelleburgJ. R. (2019). Quantifying the safety benefits of a digital copilot in general aviation. Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, 16(8), 296–306. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.i010704
CahillJ.DonaldN. M. (2006). Human computer interaction methods for electronic flight bag envisionment and design. Cognition, Technology & Work, 8(2), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-006-0026-z
7.
CarrollM.DahlströmN. (2021). Human computer interaction on the modern flight deck. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37(7), 585–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1890495
8.
ChandraD. C.KendraA. (2009). Review of safety reports involving electronic flight bags [Symposium]. In 2009 International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 407–412). IEEE. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/isap_2009/48/
ChaseS. G.HiltunenD. (2021). Electronic flight bag (EFB) information management and training (DOT-VNTSC-FAA-21-08). John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (U.S.). https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/56269
11.
DursoF. T.DattelA. R. (2004). SPAM: The real-time assessment of SA. In BanburyS.TrembleyS. (Eds.), A cognitive approach to situation awareness: Theory, measures and application (pp. 137–154). Routledge.
FernandesA.BraarudP. Ø. (2015). Exploring measures of workload, situation awareness, and task performance in the main control room. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 1281–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.273
GermanE. S.RhodesD. H. (2016). Human-model interactivity: What can be learned from the experience of pilots with the glass cockpit? [Conference session]. 2016 Conference on Systems Engineering Research. Systems Engineering Advancement Research Initiative. IEEE.
20.
HaddockK. N.BeckmanW. S. (2015). The effect of electronic flight bag use on pilot performance during an instrument approach. Collegiate Aviation Review, 33(1), 100460. https://doi.org/10.22488/okstate.18.100460
21.
KafalıH.AteşS. S. (2021). Risk analysis with decision tree method on the use of electronic flight bags: A case study on pilots. European Journal of Science and Technology, 25, 562–570. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.917743
22.
LopesN. M.AparícioM.NevesF. T. (2022). Supporting situation awareness on aviation pilots: Key insights affecting the use of electronic flight bags devices. In RochaA.AdeliH.DzemydaG.MoreiraF. (Eds.), Lecture notes in networks and systems (pp. 93–101). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04819-7_10
23.
LytleD. (2015). Pilot perception of electronic flight bags at part 121 air carriers [Theses and Dissertations. University of North Dakota]. https://commons.und.edu/theses/361/
24.
MisraS.HalleranM. (2019). The effect of electronic flight bags in flight training on preflight skill development and aeronautical decision making. Collegiate Aviation Review International, 37(2), 136. https://commons.erau.edu/student-works/136
25.
SchwartzentruberJ. (2017). A usability study for electronic flight bag (EFB) flight planning applications on tablet devices for ab-initio pilots. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 4(2), 1162. https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaa.2017.1162
SuppiahS.LiuD.LeeS.DattelA. R.VincenziD. A. (2020). Impact of electronic flight bag (EFB) on single pilot performance and workload. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 7(4), 1531. https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2020.1531
28.
YehM.JaworskiJ.ChaseS. (2019). Pilot perceptions on the integration of electronic flight bag information in new flight deck designs. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 63(1), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181319631335
29.
ZhangT.YangJ.LiangN.PittsB. J.Prakah-AsanteK. O.CurryR.DuerstockB. S.WachsJ. P.YuD. (2020). Physiological measurements of situation awareness: A systematic review. Human Factors, 65(5), 737–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820969071
