Procedures are commonly used to specify tasks in high-risk industries. Among various performance-shaping factors, time pressure has been studied as a potential contributor to procedural performance. This scoping review aimed to summarize and synthesize literature that induced and studied the role of time pressure on performance such as time, errors, and subjective workload. This review included a total of nine papers and identified that time pressure can be induced by visual component, auditory component, or a combination of both. The effect of time pressure may vary depending on the industry. While most studies in the military or medical fields have found no effect of time pressure, time pressure affects performance in nuclear power plants, aviation, and oil and gas industries.
DongX.YuH.LiZ. (2013). Influence of personality factors and time pressure on human performance when using digital interfaces. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 57(1), 863–867. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571187
3.
GasB. L.BuckarmaE. H.CookD. A.FarleyD. R.PusicM. V. (2018). Is speed a desirable difficulty for learning procedures? An initial exploration of the effects of chronometric pressure. Academic Medicine, 93(6), 920–928. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002167
4.
HalimS. Z.JanardananS.FlechasT.MannanM. S. (2018). In search of causes behind offshore incidents: Fire in offshore oil and gas facilities. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 54, 254–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2018.04.006
5.
HartS. G.StavelandL. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and Theoretical Research. In HancockP. A.MeshkatiN. (Eds.), Advances in Psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 139–183). North-Holland.
6.
HicksW. B.PryorM.SpruferaJ.GreeneA.ByrneV.McLaughlinA. C. (2018). Time pressure and teams: Contextual factors influencing task experience when using a cognitive aid. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62(1), 125–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931218621029
7.
KobbeltvedtT.BrunW.LabergJ. C. (2005). Cognitive processes in planning and judgements under sleep deprivation and time pressure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.05.002
8.
LinC. P. (2010). Understanding negative impacts of perceived cognitive load on job learning effectiveness: A social capital solution. Human Factors, 52(6), 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810386606
9.
MehtaR.ThomasS. (2018). Effects of time pressure and experience level on worker perceived workload: Implications for procedural designs in high-risk industrial tasks. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62(1), 1610–1615. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931218621364
10.
OlsonW. A.SarterN. B. (2001). Management by consent in human-machine systems: When and why it breaks down. Human Factors, 43(2), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872001775900904
PooladvandS.HasanzadehS. (2022). Neurophysiological evaluation of workers’ decision dynamics under time pressure and increased mental demand. Automation in Construction, 141, 104437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104437
13.
SchardtC.AdamsM. B.OwensT.KeitzS.FonteloP. (2007). Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-7-16
14.
SheikhalishahiM.AzadehA.PintelonL.ChemwenoP. (2017). Human factors effects and analysis in maintenance: A power plant case study. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 33(4), 895–903. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2065
15.
TriccoA. C.LillieE.ZarinW.O’BrienK. K.ColquhounH.LevacD.MoherD.PetersM. D. J.HorsleyT.WeeksL.HempelS.AklE. A.ChangC.McGowanJ.StewartL.HartlingL.AldcroftA.WilsonM. G.GarrittyC.. . . StrausS. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0850
16.
TsigaE.PanagopoulouE.SevdalisN.MontgomeryA.BenosA. (2013). The influence of time pressure on adherence to guidelines in primary care: An experimental study. BMJ Open, 3(4), e002700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002700
17.
WarrenW. R.BlickensderferB.CruitJ.BoquetA. (2013). Shift turnover strategy and time in aviation maintenance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 57(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571013
18.
YoungD. L.GoodieA. S.HallD. B.WuE. (2012). Decision making under time pressure, modeled in a prospect theory framework. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.005
