Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Function allocation (FA) has been defined in regulatory review guidance for the U.S. nuclear industry as the process of assigning responsibility for accomplishing functions to personnel or automation, or to a combination of them. FA is an important step in the industry’s approach to Human Factors Engineering (HFE) because it, along with other HFE activities, helps ensure safe and reliable plant operations. New reactors designed with advanced technologies, however, fundamentally change how humans will operate these plants and thus has implications for FA. This research updates the guidance for reviewing FA as part of an HFE program review. The update includes a description of how the topic of FA is characterized and evaluates FA methods for application to modern reactors. The goal is to improve how FA is performed and reviewed to help ensure the safety and efficiency of nuclear power plants, and support the design, analysis, and deployment of automation technologies.

Keywords

function allocation nuclear industry

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fitts

P. M.

(1951). Human engineering for an effective air navigation and traffic control system. Ohio State University Foundation Report.

Fuld

R. B.

(1993). The fiction of function allocation. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 1(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/106480469300100106

Hancock

P. A.

Scallen

S. F.

(1996). The future of function allocation. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 4(4), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/106480469600400406

International Atomic Energy Agency. (1992). Safety related terms for advanced nuclear plants (IAEA-TecDoc-626). International Atomic Energy Agency.

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. (2021). IEEE guide for human factors engineering for the validation of system designs and integrated systems operations at nuclear facilities (IEEE Std 2411-2021). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2021.9633355

Joe

J. C.

Oxstrand

J. H.

(2014). Effects of an advanced reactor’s design, use of automation, and mission on human operators. In Smith

Paulos

(Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 12) (Vol. 10, pp. 286–294).

Morrow

Hughes Green

(2025). Translating human factors research to regulatory guidance in the nuclear industry. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 69, No. 1). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251361893

O’Hara

(2025). Analytical and performance-based evaluation alternatives to full-scope, high-fidelity testbeds (BNL Technical Report No. 227577). Brookhaven National Laboratory.

O’Hara

Higgins

Brown

Fink

Persensky

Lewis

Kramer

Szabo

(2008). Human factors considerations with respect to emerging technology in nuclear power plants (NUREG/CR-6947). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

10.

O’Hara

Higgins

Fleger

Pieringer

(2012). Human factors engineering program review model (NUREG-0711, Rev. 3). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

11.

Pulliam

Price

Bongarra

Sawyer

Kisner

(1983). A methodology for allocating nuclear power plant control functions to human or automatic control (NUREG/CR-3331). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

12.

Reason

(2008). The human contribution: Unsafe acts, accidents, and heroic recoveries. CRC Press.

13.

Wald

(2024). The state of advanced reactors. Nuclear News, 67(1), 54–62.

Updating the Function Allocation Technical Bases and Regulatory Guidance for Nuclear Power Plants

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References