Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

As automation in aviation advances, real-time insights into pilot mental workload (MWL) are critical for adaptive systems. This study applies a Bayesian multivariate approach to quantify MWL using physiological data collected from five instrument-rated pilots during simulated flights. Participants completed four flight scenarios varying in automation level (on/off) and workload (1-back vs. 2-back task), while electroencephalogram (EEG) and electrocardiogram (ECG) data were recorded. A Bayesian model analyzed physiological indicators such as heart rate, heart rate variability, respiration rate, and EEG to understand workload. Results showed significant associations between physiological measures and both automation and workload conditions, despite subjective NASA-TLX scores showing no significant differences. Findings support the use of physiological sensing combined with Bayesian modeling to dynamically assess MWL in small sample contexts. This approach may inform future adaptive automation systems by enabling real-time, individualized workload monitoring to maintain performance and engagement across flight conditions.

Keywords

adaptive automation cognitive workload physiological data human automation interaction aviation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chen

S. H.

Mitra

Chen

(2008). Human performance issues and user interface design for teleoperated robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part C: Applications and Reviews, 38(6), 1231–1245. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2008.2001131

Eriksson

Stanton

N. A.

Banks

A. P.

(2015). The psycho-physiological effects of feedback in a simulated flight environment. Applied Ergonomics, 50, 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.02.011

Estes

(2015). Statistical learning in cognitive science. Oxford University Press.

Fitts

P. M.

(1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(6), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055392

Graeber

D. A.

(1989). Vigilance and its measurement. In Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp. 151–157). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hadfield

J. D.

(2010). MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: The MCMCglmm R package. Journal of Statistical Software, 33(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i02

Hart

S. G.

Staveland

L. E.

(1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Hancock

P. A.

Meshkati

(Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139–183).

Jonides

Nee

D. E.

(2006). Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory. Neuroscience, 139(1), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.06.042

Makowski

(2018). The psycho package: An efficient and publishing-oriented workflow for psychological science. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(22), 470. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00470

10.

Mansikka

Virtanen

Harris

Simola

(2019). Measuring pilot mental workload using heart rate and heart rate variability during simulator training. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 9(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1027/2192-0923/a000161

11.

Mohanavelu

Dev

Suresh

(2020). Heart rate variability as a measure of mental workload in pilots: A review. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 150, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.02.002

12.

Plummer

Best

Cowles

Vines

(2006). CODA: Convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R News, 6(1), 7–11.

13.

Ren

Liu

(2023). Measuring cognitive load during flight simulation using n-back and physiological metrics. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 94(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6080.2023

14.

Sarter

N. B.

Billings

C. E.

Woods

D. D.

(2022). Automation surprises. In Human error in aviation (pp. 437–452). CRC Press.

15.

Svoboda

Parasuraman

Hilburn

(2019). Automation in aviation: Effects on human performance and implications for training. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 29(2), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508414.2019.1593933

16.

Yerkes

R. M.

Dodson

J. D.

(1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18(5), 459–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.920180503

A Bayesian Multivariate Approach to Quantifying Pilot Physiology for Adaptive Automation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References