Measuring the Effect of a Powered Ankle Exoskeleton on Directed Attention

Abstract

Exoskeletons are a wearable technology that augment users’ mobility; however, our understanding of their influence on navigational decisions is limited. Street crossing is a navigational task requiring adequate situation awareness, which includes directed attention—the deliberate act of concentration. Evaluating whether exoskeletons affect users’ directed attention is beneficial because this technology intends to support wearers performing other activities. This study evaluated whether the Dephy ExoBoot affected head directions, a surrogate for directed attention, at a simulated traffic intersection. Adults without mobility limitations approached the intersection on a self-paced treadmill and made crossing decisions with and without the exoskeleton. A Linear Mixed Effects (LME) model did not support consistent influences of the exoskeleton on head direction across participants. A cluster analysis of head-direction percentages supported sex- and height-specific strategies for environmental scanning. Methods assessing how exoskeletons impact attention enable designs that afford users sufficient cognitive resources to perform other tasks.

Keywords

decision making mental workload assistive technologies virtual environments exoskeleton directed attention

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acosta-Sojo

Stirling

(2021). Individuals differ in muscle activation patterns during early adaptation to a powered ankle exoskeleton. Applied Ergonomics, 98, 103593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103593

Benjamini

Hochberg

(1995). Controlling the false discovery Rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x

Bril

Ledebt

(1998). Head coordination as a means to assist sensory integration in learning to walk. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 22(4), 555–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-7634(97)00044-4

Calinski

Harabasz

(1974). A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods, 3(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610927408827101

Connelly

M. L.

Conaglen

H. M.

Parsonson

B. S.

Isler

R. B.

(1998). Child pedestrians’ crossing gap thresholds. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30(4), 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-4575(97)00109-7

Harré

Field

Kirkwood

(1996). Gender differences and areas of common concern in the driving behaviors and attitudes of adolescents. Journal of Safety Research, 27(3), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4375(96)00013-8

Hartigan

J. A.

Wong

M. A.

(1979). Algorithm AS 136: A K-Means clustering algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics), 28(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346830

Hirasaki

Moore

S. T.

Raphan

Cohen

(1999). Effects of walking velocity on vertical head and body movements during locomotion. Experimental Brain Research, 127(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050781

Koren

Mairon

Sofer

Parmet

Ben-Shahar

Bar-Haim

(2022). Vision, cognition, and walking stability in young adults. Scientific Reports, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04540-w

10.

Leveque

Ranchet

Deniel

Bornard

Bellet

(2020). Where do pedestrians look when crossing? A state of the art of the Eye-Tracking studies. IEEE Access, 8, 164833–164843. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3021208

11.

Oxley

Whelan

(2008). It cannot be all about safety: The benefits of prolonged mobility. Traffic Injury Prevention, 9(4), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389580801895285

12.

Raoniar

Maurya

A. K

. (2022). Pedestrian red-light violation at signalised intersection crosswalks: Influence of social and non-social factors. Safety Science, 147, 105583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105583

13.

Stirling

Kelty-Stephen

Fineman

Jones

M. L. H.

Daniel Park

B. K.

Reed

M. P.

Parham

Choi

H. J.

(2020). Static, dynamic, and cognitive fit of exosystems for the human operator. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 62(3), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819896898

14.

Stiefelhagen

Zhu

(2002). Head orientation and gaze direction in meetings. CHI ‘02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 858–859. https://doi.org/10.1145/506443.506634

15.

Sun

Zhuang

Zhao

Zhang

(2015). The estimation of vehicle speed and stopping distance by pedestrians crossing streets in a naturalistic traffic environment. Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 30, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.02.002

16.

M. I.

Stirling

(2024). Emergent gait strategies defined by cluster analysis when using imperfect exoskeleton algorithms. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 9(4), 3171–3178. https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2024.3366010

17.

Yagil

(2000). Beliefs, motives and situational factors related to pedestrians’ self-reported behavior at signal-controlled crossings. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1369-8478(00)00004-8