In this study, we develop an experimental environment for studying human spatial awareness and memory as well as a neuro-computational connectionist model based on hyperdimensional computing, useful for modeling participants’ ability to store and recall stimuli. A qualitative comparison between the proposed model’s confidence, in which it recalls past stimuli, and a participant’s performance in recalling the same past stimuli, was conducted. The results demonstrate that the proposed memory model shows promise for modeling participant performance fall-off, offering a potentially useful tool for neuroergonomics research.
AygunS.MoghadamM. S.NajafiM. H.ImaniM. (2023). Learning from hypervectors: A survey on hypervector encoding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.00685.
2.
BarbosaJ.SteinH.MartinezR. L.Galan-GadeaA.LiS.DalmauJ.AdamK. C. S.Valls-SoléJ.ConstantinidisC.CompteA. (2020). Interplay between persistent activity and activity-silent dynamics in the prefrontal cortex underlies serial biases in working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 23, 1016–1024.
3.
BuckS.BastosF.BaldewegT.Vargha-KhademF. (2021). The pair test: A computerised measure of learning and memory. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 928–942.
4.
CondonD. M.RevelleW. (2014). The international cognitive ability resource: Development and initial validation of a public-domain measure. Intelligence, 43, 52–64.
FradyE. P.KentS. J.OlshausenB. A.SommerF. T. (2020). Resonator networks, 1: An efficient solution for factoring high-dimensional, distributed representations of data structures. Neural Computation, 32(12), 2311–2331.
HintzmanD. L. (1984). Minerva 2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 16(2), 96–101.
9.
HopfieldJ. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 79(8), 2554–2558.
10.
KanervaP. (2009). Hyperdimensional computing: An introduction to computing in distributed representation with high-dimensional random vectors. Cognitive Computation, 1, 139–159.
11.
KentS. J.FradyE. P.SommerF. T.OlshausenB. A. (2020). Resonator networks, 2: Factorization performance and capacity compared to optimization-based methods. Neural Computation, 32(12), 2332–2388.
12.
KimN.NamC. S. (2020). Adaptive control of thought-rational (act-r): Applying a cognitive architecture to neuroergonomics. In Neuroergonomics: Principles and practice. Springer, Cham (pp. 105–114).
13.
LaihoM.PoikonenJ. H.KanervaP.LehtonenE. (2015). High-dimensional computing with sparse vectors [Conference session]. 2015 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS) (pp. 1–4).
14.
LiuY.WuC.BermanM. G. (2012). Computational neuroergonomics. NeuroImage, 59(1), 109–116.
15.
ParasuramanR.RizzoM. (2006). Neuroergonomics: The brain at work. Oxford University Press.
16.
RamsauerH.SchäflB.LehnerJ.SeidlP.WidrichM.AdlerT.GruberL.HolzleitnerM.PavlovićM.SandveG. K.GreiffV.KreilD.KoppM.KlambauerG.BrandstetterJ.HochreiterS. (2020). Hopfield networks is all you need. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.02217.
17.
RoyD. S.ParkY.-G.KimM. E.ZhangY.OgawaS. K.DiNapoliN.GuX.ChoJ. H.ChoiH.KamentskyL.MartinJ.MostoO.AidaT.ChungK.TonegawaS. (2022). Brain-wide mapping reveals that engrams for a single memory are distributed across multiple brain regions. Nature Communications, 13, 1799.
18.
RumelhartD. E.HintonG. E.McClellandJ. L. (1986). A general framework for parallel distributed processing. In Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Mit Press (Vol. 1, pp. 45–76).
19.
TrevesA.RollsE. (1991). What determines the capacity of autoassociative memories in the brain?Network Computation in Neural Systems, 2(4), 371–397.
20.
WolffM. J.JochimJ.AkyürekE. G.StokesM. G. (2017). Dynamic hidden states underlying working-memory-guided behavior. Nature Neuroscience, 20(6), 864–871.
