Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper describes a study aimed at developing and applying a method for comparing the user experience (UX) of virtual reality (VR) systems, in order to identify aspects that differentiate VR systems from a user perspective as well as aspects that users consider important when selecting a VR system. A within-subjects study was conducted, in which twelve participants played a VR game using four different VR systems (i.e., VR headsets and hand controllers). The UX was evaluated through semi-structured interviews and questionnaires. Headset comfort, fit, and perceived image quality as well as unrestricted mobility (i.e., untethered headsets) were identified as important aspects for the UX. Hand controllers that allowed more natural interaction were generally preferred. Image sharpness and headset comfort were considered the most important aspects for selecting a VR system. The study demonstrated that the method can be applied and generate insights into the UX of VR systems.

Keywords

virtual reality VR user experience UX headset hand controller

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbas

J. R.

Chu

M. M. H.

Jeyarajah

Isba

Payton

McGrath

Tolley

Bruce

(2023). Virtual reality in simulation-based emergency skills training: A systematic review with a narrative synthesis. Resuscitation Plus, 16, Article 100484.

Angelov

Petkov

Shipkovenski

Kalushkov

(2020, June 26–28). Modern virtual reality headsets. 2020 International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications, Ankara, Turkey (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

Bailey

S. K. T.

Lewis

J. E.

Ciccone

B. A.

Friedland

R. L.

Reiner

C. C.

(2023). Assessing usability of untethered head-mounted displays for medical education: A within-person randomized trial. Simulation in Healthcare, 18(1), 58–63.

Binsch

Bottenheft

Landman

Roijendijk

Vermetten

E. H. G. J. M

. (2021). Testing the applicability of a virtual reality simulation platform for stress training of first responders. Military Psychology, 33(3), 182–196.

Binsch

Oudejans

van der Kuil

M. N. A.

Landman

Smeets

M. M. J.

Leers

M. P. G.

Smit

A. S.

(2023). The effect of virtual reality simulation on police officers’ performance and recovery from a real-life surveillance task. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82, 17471–17492.

Hamad

Jia

(2022). How virtual reality technology has changed our lives: An overview of the current and potential applications and limitations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), Article 11278.

Hartson

Pyla

P. S.

(2012). The UX Book: Process and guidelines for ensuring a quality user experience. Elsevier.

iGroup. (n.d.). igroup presence questionnaire (IPQ) overview. https://www.igroup.org/pq/ipq/index.php

Kim

Y. M.

Rhiu

Yun

M. H.

(2020). A systematic review of a virtual reality system from the perspective of user experience. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(10), 893–910.

10.

Mehrfard

Fotouhi

Taylor

Forster

Armand

Navab

Fuerst

(2021). Virtual reality technologies for clinical education: Evaluation metrics and comparative analysis. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization, 9(3), 233–242.

11.

Singla

Fremerey

Robitza

Raake

(2017, May 31–June 2). Measuring and comparing QoE and simulator sickness of omnidirectional videos in different head mounted displays [Conference session]. 2017 Ninth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience, Erfurt, Germany (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

12.

Souchet

A. D.

Lourdeaux

Pagani

Rebenitsch

(2023). A narrative review of immersive virtual reality’s ergonomics and risks at the workplace: Cybersickness, visual fatigue, muscular fatigue, acute stress, and mental overload. Virtual Reality, 27, 19–50.

13.

Suh

Prophet

(2018). The state of immersive technology research: A literature analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 77–90.

14.

Vlahovic

Suznjevic

Skorin-Kapov

(2022). A survey of challenges and methods for quality of experience assessment of interactive VR applications. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 16, 257–291.

15.

Witmer

B. G.

Singer

M. J.

(1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225–240.

16.

Xie

Liu

Alghofaili

Zhang

Jiang

Lobo

F. D.

Huang

Akdere

Mousas

L.-F.

(2021). A review on virtual reality skill training applications. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2, Article 645153.

Comparing Virtual Reality Systems: Aspects of Importance for User Experience

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References