This study presents a novel workflow integrating 3D scanning, parametric design, and hybrid fabrication methods to develop custom-fit medical masks tailored to individual facial profiles. Addressing discomfort and poor fit associated with standardized-size medical masks, the proposed approach in this study uses seven facial landmarks from 3D scans to generate mask models through a parametric system in Rhinoceros and Grasshopper software. Mask prototypes were fabricated with EVA foam frames and multi-layered polypropylene filters, simulating N95 performances. Fit tests conducted with participants demonstrated that the custom-fit masks outperformed traditional N95 masks in fit and comfort across seven indicators. By validating the workflow through digital modeling and physical prototyping, this research offers a scalable and flexible method for improving mask ergonomics and wearing experience. The study highlights the potential of custom-fit design solutions to enhance the health and well-being of medical mask users, contributing to broader applications in healthcare and inclusive design.
Amoozegar-MonteroA. X.(2016). Parametric modelling and digital manufacturing for better bra fit & design (Master’s thesis, Victoria University of Wellington). Victoria University of Wellington Research Archive. https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.13012841.v1
3.
ArumuruV.PasaJ.SamantarayS. S.VarmaV. S. (2021). Breathing, virus transmission, and social distancing—An experimental visualization study. AIP Advances, 11(4), 045205. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0045582
4.
AshdownS. P.DunneL. (2006). A study of automated custom fit: Readiness of the technology for the apparel industry. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X0602400206
5.
BaiX.HuertaO.UnverE.AllenJ.ClaytonJ. E. (2021). A parametric product design framework for the development of mass customized head/face (eyewear) products. Applied Sciences, 11(12), Article 5382. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125382
Ben AzouzZ.ShuC.MantelA. (2006). Automatic locating of anthropometric landmarks on 3D human models. In Proceedings of the third international symposium on 3D data processing, visualization, and transmission (3DPVT’06) (pp. 750–757). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DPVT.2006.34
ChapmanD.StrongM.CampbellR.UllahS.ShahidS.RichardsG. A.LaurenM.GanesanA. N. (2023). Personalized 3D-printed frames to reduce leak from N95 filtering facepiece respirators: A prospective crossover trial in health care workers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 20(7), 304–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2023.2205471
10.
ChenY.ZhuL. (2022). A masked facial landmarks localization method considering the mask-face contact characteristics. 2022 5th International Conference on Data Storage and Data Engineering, 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1145/3528114.3528133
11.
ChuC.-H.HuangS.-H.YangC.-K.TsengC.-Y. (2015). Design customization of respiratory mask based on 3D face anthropometric data. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 16(3), 487–494.
12.
ChuC.-H.WangI. J. (2018). Mass customized design of cosmetic masks using three-dimensional parametric human face models constructed from anthropometric data. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 18(3), Article 031010. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039335
13.
ChuC. H.WangI. J.WangJ. B.LuhY. P. (2017). 3D parametric human face modeling for personalized product design: Eyeglasses frame design case. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 32, 202–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2017.03.001
14.
CloetA.GriffinL.YuM.DurfeeW. (2022). Design considerations for protective mask development: A remote mask usability evaluation. Applied Ergonomics, 102, 103751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103751
GillS.McDonaldC.SchildmeyerK.ToddD. (2023, October17–18). Building novel dynamic pattern theory via 3D body scanning data. In Proceedings of 3DBODY.TECH 2023 – 14th international conference and exhibition on 3D body scanning and processing technologies, Lugano, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.15221/23.45
17.
HuJ.DunG.GengX.ChenJ.WuX.RenT.-L. (2023). Recent progress in flexible micro-pressure sensors for wearable health monitoring. Nanoscale Advances, 5(12), 3131–3145. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2na00866a
KimS.ParkC. K. (2004). Parametric body model generation for garment drape simulation. Fibers and Polymers, 5(1), 12–18.
21.
KostylevaV. V.KonovalovaO. B. (2020). Concept of parametric design and fast 3D printing of individual shoes. Industry, 4, 5(2), 72–75.
22.
Kumar ShubhanshuSinghA. (2021). Prolonged use of n95 mask a boon or bane to healthcare workers during Covid–19 Pandemic. IndianJournal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02396-0
23.
LeeW.LeeB.YangX.JungH.BokI.KimC.KwonO.YouH. (2018). A 3D anthropometric sizing analysis system based on North American CAESAR 3D scan data for design of head wearable products. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 117, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.01.023
24.
LiJ.TanakaH. (2018). Feasibility study applying a parametric model as the design generator for 3D-printed orthosis for fracture immobilization. 3D Printing in Medicine, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-017-0024-1
LinY.-C.ChenC.-P. (2017). Characterization of small-to-medium head-and-face dimensions for developing respirator fit test panels and evaluating fit of filtering facepiece respirators with different faceseal design. PLOS ONE, 12(11), e0188638. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188638
27.
LiuJ.MaJ.AhmedI. I. K.VarmaD. K. (2022, June). Effectiveness of a 3D-printed mask fitter in an ophthalmology setting during COVID-19. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 57(3), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2021.03.004
28.
LiuK.ZhuC.TaoX.BruniauxP.ZengX. (2019). Parametric design of garment pattern based on body dimensions. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 72, 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.05.012
29.
LuJ.-M.WangM.-J. J. (2008). Automated anthropometric data collection using 3D whole body scanners. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(1), 407–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.07.008
30.
MakowskiK.OkrasaM. (2019). Application of 3D scanning and 3D printing for designing and fabricating customized half-mask facepieces: A pilot study. WORK, 63(1), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-192913
31.
MansiS. A.BaroneG.ForzanoC.PigliautileI.FerraraM.PiselloA. L.ArnesanoM. (2021). Measuring human physiological indices for thermal comfort assessment through wearable devices:A review. Measurement, 183, 109872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109872
32.
MeenaJ. S.ChoiS. B.JungS.-B.KimJ.-W. (2023). Electronic textiles: New age of wearable technology for healthcare and fitness solutions. Materials Today Bio, 19, 100565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100565
33.
MirikarD.PalanivelS.ArumuruV. (2021). Droplet fate, efficacy of face mask, and transmission of virus-laden droplets inside a conference room. Physics of Fluids, 33(6), 065108. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0054110
Nahmad VazquezA.ChenL. (2021). Automated generation of custom fit PPE inserts. In: ACADIA 2021: Realignments: toward critical computation (Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Association of Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA)), Online and Global, 3-6 November 2021. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.acadia.2021.048
36.
NgI.KaveB.BeggF.BodasC. R.SegalR.WilliamsD. (2022). N95 respirators: Quantitative fit test pass rates and usability and comfort assessment by health care workers. The Medical Journal of Australia, 217(2), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.51585
ParkS.TianY.BergmanM.PollardJ.ZhuangZ.JayaramanS. (2024). Next-generation custom-fit reusable respiratory protective device with continuous fit monitoring – Part I: Custom-fit design. Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection, 41(1), 22–38.
39.
RosnerE. (2020). Adverse effects of prolonged mask use among healthcare professionals during COVID-19. Journal of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, 6, 130. https://doi.org/10.23937/2474-3658/1510130
TnebR.SeidlA.HansenG.PruettC. (2000). 3-D body scanning—Systems, methods and applications for automatic interpretation of 3D surface anthropometrical data. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 44(38), 844–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120004403844
42.
WilliamsS. T.HardingT. H.StatzJ. K.MartinJ. S. (2017). Blast wave dynamics at the cornea as a function of eye protection form and fit. Military Medicine, 182(S1), 226–229. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00042
43.
WuY. Y.AcharyaD.XuC.ChengB.RanaS.ShimadaK. (2018). Custom-fit three-dimensional-printed BiPAP mask to improve compliance in patients requiring long-term noninvasive ventilatory support. Journal of Medical Devices, 12(3), 0310031–0310038. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040187
44.
YanY.JiaY. (2022). A review on human comfort factors, measurements, and improvements in human–robot collaboration. Sensors, 22(19), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197431
45.
YuA.YickK. L.NgS. P.YipJ. (2013). 2D and 3D anatomical analyses of hand dimensions for custom-made gloves. Applied Ergonomics, 44(3), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.10.001
46.
YuM.GriffinL. A. (2024). Product specific anthropometry for wearable product design: A case study of respirator specific face anthropometry development and testing (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4837907). SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4837907
47.
YudinA. B.SoshkinP. A.VlasovA. A.PesenkoA. N.ZabrodskyD. S.ZaitsevA. G. (2023). 3D-scanning is a promising technology for the study of anthropometric indicators in military personnel. Marine Medicine, 8(4), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.22328/2413-5747-2022-8-4-112-117
48.
ZhuZ.HuangY.JiW.ZhuJ.WangW. (2024). A parametric design framework for the mass customization of bicycle helmet. Heliyon, 10(5), e27409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27409
49.
ZhuangZ.BradtmillerB. (2005). Head-and-face anthropometric survey of U.S. respirator users. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2(11), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620500324727
