Abstract
To truly design for people—addressing the full spectrum of human capacities and limitations—it is critical that the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES) fosters a welcoming and inclusive environment for HF/E professionals and students of diverse backgrounds and experiences. It is essential that HFES, like any other organization, considers how its current structures fail to include people of historically excluded and/or minoritized identities. During this session, the leaders of HFES-sponsored affinity groups (AGs) and of the Council of Affinity Group (COAG) will share their perspectives on what “inclusion” means to them and provide practical insight into what it looks like in practice.
Introduction and Motivation
Human Factors and Ergonomics (HF/E) professionals are innately required to consider the differences and varying perspectives of their users and other stakeholders to jointly optimize system performance and the well-being of the people in the system. This is even more the case as HF/E tools are leveraged in increasingly diverse working populations, jobs, and environments. To truly design for people—addressing the full spectrum of human capacities and limitations—it is critical that HFES fosters a welcoming and inclusive environment for HF/E professionals and students of diverse backgrounds and experiences. It is essential that HFES, like any other organization, considers how its current structures fail to include people of historically excluded and/or minoritized identities.
The proposed panel, made up of the Chairs of the HFES Affinity Groups and the Council of Affinity Groups (COAG), will interact with the issue of making HFES more inclusive, with a special focus on the populations they represent. Session attendees will gain a better understanding of what is meant by “inclusion” and what it takes to be inclusive. The panel will build on previous years’ COAG conversations which have explored the perspectives of HF/E professionals of minoritized identities and invited participants to practice empathy and allyship (Bruni et al., 2023; Hughes et al., 2022).
Activities During This Panel
This highly interactive panel will be moderated by Dr. Hanna Barton (they/them) in their role as the Co-Chair of the COAG. They will open the session with a brief silent exercise inviting attendees to visualize (or reflect on) “inclusion” and upon completion of the exercise write down two or three things that stood out to them in their visualization.
The moderator will then ask each participant on the panel to introduce themselves and briefly share what inclusion means to them. As panelists are sharing, attendees will be invited to submit their reflections in an electronic format. Together, the moderator will review and highlight people’s reflections, inviting panelists to comment as they see fit. Then, the moderator will shift the conversation to exploring what inclusion looks like in practice by inviting the panelists to describe how their affinity group addresses inclusion and/or any inclusion needs that are specific to the populations they represent.
The conversation will be scoped to the professional environment to provide practical feedback for attendees to practice and implement in their own interpersonal relationships and organizations. During this section, attendees will have the opportunity to submit questions, which the moderator will filter for discussion by panelists. Each panelist will be provided the opportunity at the end of the session to share their one sentence takeaway and plug any upcoming events or activities.
Moderator
Invited Panelists
Footnotes
Authors’ Note
This panel is part of the activities planned by the leaders of the Council of Affinity Groups for the annual meeting. However, the opinions and views contained herein are those of the authors. We thank the conference organizing committee and the Society for providing space and support for discussions to increase inclusion within the organization, past and future.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
