BischofJ. M.AiroldiE. M. (2012). Summarizing topical content with word frequency and exclusivity. Proceedings of the 29th International Coference on International Conference on Machine Learning, Edinburgh, Scotland.
2.
ChangJ.GerrishS.WangC.Boyd-GraberJ. L.BleiD. M. (2009). Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 288-296).
3.
CohenE.KuoD. Z.AgrawalR.BerryJ. G.BhagatS. K.SimonT. D.SrivastavaR. (2011). Children with medical complexity: an emerging population for clinical and research initiatives. Pediatrics, 127(3), 529–538. doi:10.1542/peds.2010-0910
4.
DoutchevaN.ThomasH.ParksR.CollerR.WernerN. (2019). Homes of children with medical complexity as a complex work system: outcomes associated with interactions in the physical environment. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 63(1), 753-757. doi:10.1177/1071181319631484
5.
HoldenR. J.CarayonP.GursesA. P.HoonakkerP.HundtA. S.OzokA. A.Rivera-RodriguezA. J. (2013). SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics, 56(11), 1669-1686. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.838643
6.
KarlA.WisnowskiJ.RushingW. H. (2015). A practical guide to text mining with topic extraction. WIREs Computational Statistics, 7(5), 326-340.
7.
KuhnK. D. (2018). Using structural topic modeling to identify latent topics and trends in aviation incident reports. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 87, 105-122.
8.
LasernaC. M.SeihY.-T.PennebakerJ. W. (2014). Um . . . Who Like Says You Know: Filler Word Use as a Function of Age, Gender, and Personality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(3), 328338.
9.
LeeJ. D.KolodgeK. (2019). Exploring Trust in Self-Driving VehiclesThrough Text Analysis. Human Factors, 62(2), 260-277.
10.
LesterC. A.KesslerJ. M.ModisettT.ChuiM. A. (2019). A text mining analysis of medication quality related event reports from community pharmacies. Res Social Adm Pharm, 15(7), 845-851. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.09.013
11.
LotovA. V.MiettinenK. (2008). Visualizing the Pareto Frontier. In Multiobjective optimization (pp. 213-243). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
12.
ManningC. D.RaghavanP.SchutzeH. (2008). Evaluation in information retrieval. Introduction to Information Retrieval1188-210. Cambridge University Press.
13.
MimnoD.WallachH. M.TalleyE.LeendersM.McCallumA. (2011). Optimizing semantic coherence in topic models. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Edinburgh, UK.
14.
NackersA.EhlenbachM.KellyM. M.WernerN.WarnerG.CollerR. J. (2019). Encounters From Device Complications Among Children With Medical Complexity. Hosp Pediatr, 9(1), 6-15. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2018-0103
15.
PenningtonJ.SocherR.ManningC. D. (2014). Glove: Global vectors for word representation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing.
16.
PlissonJ.LavracN.MladenicD. (2004). A rule based approach to word lemmatization. In Proceedings of IS (Vol. 3, pp 83-86).
RobertsM.E.StewartB.M.TingleyD.LucasC.Leder-LuisJ.GadarianS.K.AlbertsonB.RandD.G. (2014). Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1064-1082.
20.
RoseJ.LennerholtC. (2017). Low cost text mining as a strategy for qualitative researchers. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 15(1), 2-16.
21.
SaundersB.SimJ.KingstoneT.BakerS.WaterfieldJ.BartlamB.BurroughsH.JinksC. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & quantity, 52(4), 1893-1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
22.
SievertC.ShirleyK. (2014). LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics. In Proceedings of the workshop on interactive language learning, visualization, and interfaces (pp. 63-70).
SimonT. D.MahantS.CohenE. (2012). Pediatric hospital medicine and children with medical complexity: past, present, and future. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care, 42(5), 113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2012.01.002
25.
The R Foundation, (2018). R (Version 3.5.1).
26.
VayanskyI.KumarS. A. (2020). A review of topic modeling methods. Information Systems, 94, 101582.
27.
WelbersK.Van AtteveldtW.BenoitK. (2017). Text analysis in R. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(4), 245-265.
28.
WuL. Y.FischA.ChopraS.AdamsK.BordesA.WestonJ. (2018). Starspace: Embed all the things!In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
29.
YuC. H.Jannasch-PennellA.DiGangiS. (2011). Compatibility between text mining and qualitative research in the perspectives of grounded theory, content analysis, and reliability. Qualitative Report, 16(3), 730-744.
30.
ZhaoW.ChenJ. J.PerkinsR.LiuZ.GeW.DingY.ZouW. (2015, December). A heuristic approach to determine an appropriate number of topics in topic modeling. In BMC bioinformatics (Vol. 16, No. 13, pp. 1-10). BioMed Central.
31.
ZieblandS.McPhersonA. (2006). Making sense of qualitative data analysis: an introduction with illustrations from DIPEx (personal experiences of health and illness). Medical education, 40(5), 405-414.