Digital technology adoption and engagement is increasing amongst older adults, prompting concerns regarding their privacy-related behaviour while engaging with these technologies. The use of cognitive biases and heuristics may help explain why older adults, and some younger people as well, make decisions that compromise their privacy in digital contexts. A literature review was carried out to assess the use of cognitive biases and heuristics by older adults when deciding whether to adopt, and while using, digital technologies. Tools are needed that guide users away from mental shortcuts such as hyperbolic discounting, anchoring, and shortcut decisions based on trust and that promote privacy protection. In addition to reviewing current literature on the use of privacy-related biases and heuristics amongst older adults, we also present possible future research directions on this topic.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AcquistiA.AdjeridI.BalebakoR.BrandimarteL.CranorL. F.KomanduriS.LeonP. G.SadehN.SchaubF.SleeperM.WangY.WilsonS. (2017). Nudges for privacy and security: Understanding and assisting users’ choices online.ACM Computing Surveys, 50(3), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3054926
2.
AnarakyR. G.ByrneK. A.WisniewskiP. J.PageX.KnijnenburgB. P. (2021). To disclose or not to disclose: Examining the privacy decision-making processes of older vs. younger adults. In
IsbisterK.IgarashiT. (Eds.), CHI’21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-14). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445204
3.
BarthS.de JongM. D. T. (2017). The privacy paradox: Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior: A systematic literature review. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1038-1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013
4.
CaineK. E.BurnhamK. E.FiskA. D.RogersW. A. (2008). Privacy concerns and disclosure behavior in a health setting. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 52(22), 1785-1789. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120805202201
5.
CaineK.ŠabanovićS.CarterM. (2012). The effect of monitoring by cameras and robots on the privacy enhancing behaviors of older adults. In
EversV.JenkinsO. C. (Eds.), HRI’12: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 343- 350). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157689.2157807
6.
ChakrabortyR.VishikC.RaghavH. R. (2013). Privacy preserving actions of older adults on social media: Exploring the behavior of opting out of information sharing. Decision Support Systems, 55(4), 948-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.01.004
7.
ChignellM. H.Quan-HaaseA.GwizdkaJ. (2003). The privacy attitudes questionnaire (PAQ): Initial development and validation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 47(11), 1326-1330. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120304701102
8.
CourtneyK. L (2008). Privacy and senior willingness to adopt smart home information technology in residential care facilities. Methods of Information in Medicine, 47(1), 76-81. https://doi.org/10.3414/me9104
HuangH.BashirM. (2018). Surfing safely: Examining older adults’ online privacy protection behaviors. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 55(1), 188-197. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501021
11.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Anchor Canada.
MentisH. M.MadjarofG.MasseyA. K. (2019). Upside and downside risk in online security for older adults with mild cognitive impairment. InCoxA.KostakosV. (Eds.), CHI’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-13). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300573
PoolJ.AkhlaghpourS.FatehiF.GrayL. C. (2022). Data privacy concerns and use of telehealth in the aged care context: An integrative review and research agenda. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 160, 104707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104707
16.
RashidiP.MihailidisA. (2013). A survey on ambient-assisted living tools for older adults. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 17(3), 579-590.https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2012.2234129
17.
ShuijingH.TaoJ. (2017). An empirical study on digital privacy risk of senior citizens. 2017 International Conference on Robots & Intelligent System (ICRIS), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRIS.2017.13
18.
SundarS. SKimJ.RossonM. B.MolinaM. D. (2020). Online privacy heuristics that predict information disclosure. In
McGrenereJ.CockburnA.AvellinoI.GogueyA.BjørnP.ZhaoS.SamsonB. P.KocielnikR. (Eds.), CHI ‘20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-12). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376854
ZeissigE.LidyniaC.VervierL.GadeibA.ZiefleM. (2017). Online privacy perceptions of older adults. In
ZhouJ.SalvendyG. (Eds.), Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Applications, Services and Contexts (pp. 181-200). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58536-9_16
