Remote operation is an emerging technical component of vehicle automation. One scenario could be a remote operator monitors the functioning of automation and take over vehicle control whenever needed. As the operator may face challenges such as degraded situation awareness or vigilance decrement, it is important to understand operator performance in a variety of takeover scenarios. This study presents an effort to create an online method for studying remote takeover performance. In this study, participants were presented with simulated driving videos and were required to indicate when they felt a takeover was needed. To ensure quality data collection in an online procedure, we made specific considerations when implementing the study. In this paper, we address these considerations and present preliminary data. Our findings suggest that operators may be less able to detect certain automation failures such as disobedience of road signs, and the online method could be useful although with limitations.
ClarkH.McLaughlinA. C.FengJ. (2017). Situational awareness and time to takeover when viewing simulated driving with high-level automation. In Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2017 Annual Meeting, 1452-1456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601848
3.
EndsleyM. R. (2000). Direct measurement of situation awareness: Validity and use of SAGAT. In EndsleyM. R.GarlandD. J. (Eds.), Situation awareness analysis and measurement (pp. 147–173). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
4.
FeiziN.TavakoliM.PatelR. V.AtashzarS. F. (2021). Robotics and AI for Teleoperation, Tele-Assessment, and Tele-training for surgery in the era of covid-19: Existing challenges, and future vision. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.610677
5.
JianJ. Y.BisantzA. M.DruryC. G. (2000). Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04
KettwichC.SchrankA.OehlM. (2021). Teleoperation of highly automated vehicles in public transport: User-centered design of a human-machine interface for remote-operation and its expert usability evaluation. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 5, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5050026
8.
KörberM.CingelA.ZimmermannM.BenglerK. (2015). Vigilance decrement and passive fatigue caused by monotony in automated driving. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2403-2409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.499
9.
ManY.LundhM.PoratheT. (2016). Seeking harmony in shore-based unmanned ship handling: From the perspective of human factors, what is the difference we need to focus on from being onboard to onshore? In BucchianicoG.D.VallicelliA.StantonN. A.LandryS. J. (Eds.) Human Factors in Transportation (1st Edition), pp.61–70. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315370460-7
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). (2013). Preliminary statement of policy concerning automated vehicles. PantAvailable at: http://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/rulemaking/pdf/
12.
MeratN.JamsonA. H.LaiF. C. H.DalyM. amp;
CarstenO. M. J. (2014). Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, 274–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.09.005
13.
MoleC.PekkanenJ.SheppardW.LouwT.RomanoR.MeratN., et al. (2020). Predicting takeover response to silent automated vehicle failures. PLoS ONE, 15(11), e0242825.
14.
SaffarianM.de WinterJ. C.HappeeR. (2012). Automated driving: Human-factors issues and Design Solutions. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56thAnnual Meeting, 2296-2300. https://doi.org/10.1037/e572172013-475
15.
SheridanT. B. (1992). Telerobotics, Automation, and Human Supervisory Control. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
16.
SunR.ZhuangX.WuC.ZhaoG.ZhangK. (2015). The estimation of vehicle speed and stopping distance by pedestrians crossing streets in a naturalistic traffic environment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 30, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.02.002
17.
WahlströmM.HakulinenJ.KarvonenH.LindborgI. (2015). Human factors challenges in unmanned ship operations – Insights from other domains. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 1038-1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.167
18.
ZhangT. (2020). Toward automated vehicle teleoperation: Vision, opportunities, and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(12), 11347-11354. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.3028766
