Vigilance tasks typically involve an operator monitoring an environment for infrequent, random critical signals, buried among more frequent neutral signals, for an extended period. In addition to a decline in task engagement, task performance, and arousal over time, these tasks are also associated with high perceived workload. Previously, music has been shown to positively influence operator engagement and response times during vigilance tasks; however, the differences between fast and slow tempo music on both vigilance performance and mood measures have not been studied. The present study examined the effects of music played at different tempos on a selection of performance metrics and self-report measures of mood, engagement, and workload. Results indicated that varying music tempo did not influence the typical decline in detection of critical signals, but the fast tempo condition had a modestly positive impact on worry and engagement from pre to post task.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Al-ShargieF.TariqU.MirH.AlawarH.BabiloniF.Al-NashashH. (2019). Vigilance decrement and enhancement techniques: A review. Brain Sciences, 9(8), 178.
2.
AmezcuaC.GuevaraM. A.Ramos-LoyoJ. (2005). Effects of musical tempi on visual attention ERPs. International Journal of Neuroscience, 115(2), 193-206.
3.
BottiroliS.RosiA.RussoR.VecchiT.CavalliniE. (2014). The cognitive effects of listening to background music on older adults: Processing speed improves with upbeat music, while memory seems to benefit from both upbeat and downbeat music. Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 6, 284.
4.
DaviesD. R.ParasuramanR. (1982). The psychology of vigilanceLondon, UK: Academic Press.
5.
DaviesD. R.LangL.ShackletonV. J. (1973). The effects of music and task difficulty on performance at a visual vigilance task. British Journal of Psychology, 64(3), 383-389.
6.
DillardM. B.WarmJ. S.FunkeG. J.FunkeM. E.FinomoreV. S.MatthewsG.ShawT. H.ParasuramanR. (2014). The sustained attention to response task (SART) does not promote mindlessness during vigilance performance. Human Factors, 56(8), 1364–1379.
7.
DillardM. B.WarmJ. S.FunkeG. J.NelsonW. T.FinomoreV. S.McClernonC. K.EggemeierF. T.TrippL. D.FunkeM. E. (2019). Vigilance tasks: Unpleasant, mentally demanding, and stressful even when time flies. Human Factors, 61(2), 225–242.
8.
EplingS. LRussellP. N.HeltonW. S. (2016). A new semantic vigilance task: Vigilance decrement, workload, and sensitivity to dual- task costs. Experimental Brain Research, 234(1), 133-139.
9.
EplingS. L.EdgarG. K.RussellP. N.HeltonW. S. (2019). Is semantic vigilance impaired by narrative memory demands? Theory and applications. Human Factors, 61(3), 451-461.
10.
FontaineC. W.SchwalmN. D. (1979). Effects of familiarity of music on vigilant performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49(1), 71-74.
11.
HartS. G.StavelandL. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology, 52, 139–183.
12.
HeltonW. S. (2004). Validation of a Short Stress State Questionnaire. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 48(11), 1238–1242.
13.
HeltonW. S.RussellP. N. (2015). Rest is best: The role of rest and task interruptions on vigilance. Cognition, 134, 165-173.
14.
HitchcockE.M.WarmJ.S.MatthewsG.DemberW.N.ShearP.K.TrippL.D.MaylebenD. W.ParasuramanR. (2003). Automation cueing modulates cerebral blood flow and vigilance in a simulated air traffic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 4, 89- 112.
15.
MackworthN. H. (1948). The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(1), 6- 21.
16.
MammarellaN.FairfieldB.CornoldiC. (2007). Does music enhance cognitive performance in healthy older adults? The Vivaldi effect. Aging clinical and experimental research, 19(5), 394-399.
17.
ManlyT.RobertsonI. H.GallowayM.HawkinsK. (1999). The absent mind: Further investigations of sustained attention to response. Neuropsychologia, 37(6), 661-670.
18.
MatthewsG.WarmJ. S.Reinerman-JonesL. E.LangheimL. K.WashburnD. A.TrippL. (2010). Task engagement, cerebral blood flow velocity, and diagnostic monitoring for sustained attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(2), 187.
19.
MayerJ. D.GaschkeY. N. (1988). The experience and meta-experience of mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 102-111. Mayfield, C., & Moss, S. (1989). Effect of music tempo on task performance. Psychological Reports, 65, 1283–1290.
20.
MonroeL. E.SmithS. L. (2021). If you’re happy and you know it stay alert: The effects of lighting on vigilance performance and affective State. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 65(1), 854-858.
21.
NeigelA. R.ClaypooleV. L.SmithS. L.WaldfogleG. E.FrauliniN. W.HancockG. M.HeltonW. S.SzalmaJ. L. (2020). Engaging the human operator: A review of the theoretical support for the vigilance decrement and a discussion of practical applications. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 21(2), 239-258.
22.
PantevC.HerholzS. (2011). Plasticity of the human auditory cortex related to musical training. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(10), 2140-2154.
23.
ParasuramanR.WarmJ. S.DemberW. N. (1987). Vigilance: Taxonomy and utility. In MarkL. S.WarmJ. S.HustonR. L. (Eds.), Ergonomics and human factors: Recent research (pp. 11-32). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
24.
SlobodaJ. A.O’NeillS. A.IvaldiA. (2001). Functions of music in everyday life: An exploratory study using the experience sampling method. Musicae Scientiae, 5(1), 9-32.
25.
SmithS. L.HeltonW. S.MatthewsG.FunkeG. J. (2021).Performance, hemodynamics, and stress in a two-day vigilance task: Practical and theoretical implications. Human Factors. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211011333
26.
StroobantN.VingerhoetsG. (2000). Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography monitoring of cerebral hemodynamics during performance of cognitive tasks: A review. Neuropsychology Review, 10, 213-231.
27.
ThomsonD. R.BesnerD.SmilekD. (2016). A critical examination of the evidence for sensitivity loss in modern vigilance tasks. Psychological review, 123(1), 70-83.
28.
ThompsonW.F.SchellenbergE.G.HusainG. (2001) Arousal, mood, and the Mozart Effect. Psychological Science12(3): 248–51.
29.
WarmJ. S. (1984). An introduction to vigilance. In WarmJ. S. (Ed.), Sustained attention in human performance (pp. 1-14). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
30.
WarmJ. S.ParasuramanR.MatthewsG. (2008). Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human factors, 50(3), 433-441
