de VisserE.ShawT.Mohamed-AmeenA.ParasuramanR. (2010). Modeling Human-Automation Team Performance in Networked Systems: Individual Differences in Working Memory Count. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. https://doi.org/10.1518/107118110X12829369833529
2.
DraheimC.PakR.DraheimA. A.EngleR. W. (2022). The role of attention control in complex real-world tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-02052-2
3.
DraheimC.TsukaharaJ. S.MartinJ. D.MashburnC. A.EngleR. W. (2021). A toolbox approach to improving the measurement of attention control. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology. General, 150(2), 242–275.
4.
ForoughiC. K.RoviraE.RoseK.DavisD.JuradoJ. J.ChaeJ.PakR.BrownN. L.SibleyC.CoyneJ. T. (2019). How do Individual Differences in Attention Control and Working Memory Capacity Relate to Monitoring Automation?Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society … Annual Meeting Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Meeting, 63(1), 1409–1413.
5.
JianJ.-Y.BisantzA. M.DruryC. G. (2000). Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 4(1), 53–71.
6.
LeeJ. D.MorayN. (1994). Trust, self-confidence, and operators’ adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40(1), 153–184.
7.
OnnaschL.WickensC. D.LiH.ManzeyD. (2014). Human Performance Consequences of Stages and Levels of Automation: An Integrated Meta-Analysis. Human Factors, 56(3), 476–488.
8.
PakR.McLaughlinA. C.LeidheiserW.RoviraE. (2017). The effect of individual differences in working memory in older adults on performance with different degrees of automated technology. Ergonomics, 60(4), 518–532.
9.
ParasuramanR.JiangY. (2012). Individual differences in cognition, affect, and performance: behavioral, neuroimaging, and molecular genetic approaches. NeuroImage, 59(1), 70–82.
10.
RoviraE.PakR.McLaughlinA. (2017). Effects of individual differences in working memory on performance and trust with various degrees of automation. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 18(6), 573–591.
11.
SaqerH.de VisserE.EmfieldA.ShawT.ParasuramanR. (2011). Adaptive Automation to Improve Human Performance in Supervision of Multiple Uninhabited Aerial Vehicles: Individual Markers of Performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society … Annual Meeting Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Meeting, 55(1), 890–893.