The Training Analytics Support (TAS) framework encompasses a theory and associated analysis stages intended to facilitate training design. Through execution of these stages, the TAS framework will allow training developers to define portfolios tailored to the needs of each trainee, track trainee mastery status across careers, and dynamically adjust portfolios to target ongoing training to specific areas in need of remediation. This document summarizes the six stages of training analytics within the TAS framework and briefly describes the manual and automated methods used to instantiate each stage.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
de la TorreJ. (2011). The generalized DINA model framework. Psychometrica, 76(2), 179-199.
2.
Headquarters, Department of the Army (2007). Aircrew Training Manual Utility Helicopter H-60 Series (Report No. TC1-237). Washington, DC: Department of the Army.
KayaY.LeiteW. (2017). Assessing change in latent skills across time with longitudinal cognitive diagnosis modeling: An evaluation of model performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 369-388.
5.
KohnH-F.ChiuC.Y. (2018). How to build a complete Q-matrix for a cognitively diagnostic task. Journal of Classification, 35, 273-299.
6.
AndersonJ.R.CorbettA.T.KoedingerK.R.PelletierR. (1995). Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 167-207.
7.
SleemanD.KellyA.E.MartinakR.WardR.D.MooreJ.L. (1989). Studies of diagnosis and remediation with high school algebra students. Cognitive Science, 13, 551-568.
8.
SottilareR.A.BrawnerK.W.SinatraA.M.JohnstonJ.H. (2017). An updated concept for a Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT). Orlando, FL: US Army Research Laboratory.
9.
WalcuttJ.J.SchatzS. (Eds.) (2019). Modernizing learning: Building the future learning ecosystem. Washington, DC: Government Publishing Office.
10.
WelzZ. (2020). The TAS software vision. GTRI IR&D Working Paper.
