Human-automation driving style similarity may be a source of trust that influences drivers’ automation use decisions. This is generally examined in scenarios where the driver is attentive to the automation. However, future automation may not require driver attention. Thus, driving style similarity must be revisited as various levels of attention may affect how drivers accumulate evidence of driving style similarity. A model that considers two levels of driver attention (attentive and non-attentive) in the drivers’ evidence accumulation process is proposed. Dissimilarity is used as the evidence that contributes to driver distrust leading to automation disuse. A 2 (conservative and aggressive automation) × 2 (attentive and non-attentive driver) simulation of car following is examined where the driver is assumed to behave conservatively. Simulation results indicated no significant effect of driving styles on disuse, but inattentiveness mitigates disuse. These simulations may inform future empirical studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhmedH. U.HuangY.LuP. (2021). A review of car-following models and modeling tools for human and autonomous-ready driving behaviors in micro-simulation. Smart Cities, 4(1), 314–335.
2.
AliF.KhanZ. H.KhanF. A.KhattakK. S.GulliverT. A. (2022). A New Driver Model Based on Driver Response. Applied Sciences, 12(11), 5390.
3.
BasuC.YangQ.HungermanD.SinahalM.DraqanA. D. (2017). Do you want your autonomous car to drive like you?2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI, 417–425.
4.
BellemH.ThielB.SchraufM.KremsJ. F. (2018). Comfort in automated driving: An analysis of preferences for different automated driving styles and their dependence on personality traits. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 55, 90–100.
5.
CameronG. D.DuncanG. I. (1996). PARAMICS—Parallel microscopic simulation of road traffic. The Journal of Supercomputing, 10(1), 25–53.
6.
CiuffoB.PunzoV.MontaninoM. (2012). Thirty years of Gipps’ car-following model: Applications, developments, and new features. Transportation Research Record, 2315(1), 89–99.
7.
DinparastdjadidA. (2020). Modeling Drivers’ Takeover from Conditional Automation. The University of Wisconsin-Madison.
8.
DurraniU.LeeC.ShahD. (2021). Predicting driver reaction time and deceleration: Comparison of perception-reaction thresholds and evidence accumulation framework. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 149, 105889.
9.
DzindoletM. T.BeckH. P.PierceL. G.DaweL. A. (2001). A framework of automation use. Army Research Lab Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.
10.
EkmanF.JohanssonM.BligårdL.-O.KarlssonM.StrömbergH. (2019). Exploring automated vehicle driving styles as a source of trust information. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 65, 268–279.
11.
EvansN. J.WagenmakersE.-J. (2019). Evidence accumulation models: Current limitations and future directions.
GarausM.WagnerU. (2019). Let me entertain you–Increasing overall store satisfaction through digital signage in retail waiting areas. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 47, 331–338.
14.
GhazizadehM.LeeJ. D.BoyleL. N. (2012). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to assess automation. Cognition, Technology & Work, 14(1), 39–49.
15.
GippsP. G. (1981). A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 15(2), 105–111.
16.
GriescheS.NicolayE.AssmannD.DotzauerM.KäthnerD. (2016). Should my car drive as I do? What kind of driving style do drivers prefer for the design of automated driving functions. Braunschweiger Symposium, 10(11), 185–204.
HoffK. A.BashirM. (2015). Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human Factors, 57(3), 407–434.
19.
KestingA.TreiberM.HelbingD. (2010). Enhanced intelligent driver model to access the impact of driving strategies on traffic capacity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 368(1928), 4585–4605.
20.
LanktonN.McKnightD. H. (2006). Using expectation disconfirmation theory to predict technology trust and usage continuance intentions. Eli Broad College of Business, Minnesota.
21.
LanktonN.McKnightD. H.ThatcherJ. B. (2014). Incorporating trust-intechnology into Expectation Disconfirmation Theory. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(2), 128–145.
22.
LeeJ. D.LiuS.-Y.DomeyerJ.DinparastDjadidA. (2021). Assessing drivers’ trust of automated vehicle driving styles with a two-part mixed model of intervention tendency and magnitude. Human Factors, 63(2), 197–209.
23.
LeeJ. D.SeeK. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50–80.
24.
LiR.BrownP. N.HorowitzR. (2021). Employing Altruistic Vehicles at On-ramps to Improve the Social Traffic Conditions. 2021 American Control Conference (ACC), 4547–4552.
25.
LinY.-S.StricklandL. (2020). Evidence accumulation models with R: A practical guide to hierarchical Bayesian methods. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 16(2), 133–153.
26.
LuZ.de WinterJ. C. (2015). A review and framework of control authority transitions in automated driving. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2510–2517.
27.
MaZ.ZhangY. (2021). Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver’s driving styles. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 159, 106238.
28.
MarkkulaG.UludağZ.WilkieR. M.BillingtonJ. (2021). Accumulation of continuously time-varying sensory evidence constrains neural and behavioral responses in human collision threat detection. PLoS Computational Biology, 17.
29.
McDonaldA. D.AlambeigiH.EngströmJ.MarkkulaG.VogelpohlT.DunneJ.YumaN. (2019). Toward computational simulations of behavior during automated driving takeovers: A review of the empirical and modeling literatures. Human Factors, 61(4), 642–688.
30.
MilosavljevicM.MalmaudJ.HuthA.KochC.RangelA. (2010). The drift diffusion model can account for value-based choice response times under high and low time pressure. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(6), 437–449.
31.
OliveiraL.ProctorK.BurnsC. G.BirrellS. (2019). Driving style: How should an automated vehicle behave?Information, 10(6), 219.
32.
OlstamJ. J.TapaniA. (2004). Comparison of Car-following models (Vol. 960). Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute Linköping, Sweden.
33.
ParasuramanR.RileyV. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2), 230–253.
34.
RatcliffR.StrayerD. (2013). Modeling Simple Driving Tasks with a One-Boundary Diffusion Model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0541-x
35.
SagbergF.SelpiBianchi PiccininiG. F.EngströmJ. (2015). A review of research on driving styles and road safety. Human Factors, 57(7), 1248– 1275.
36.
SarterN. B.WoodsD. D.BillingsC. E. – others. (1997). Automation surprises. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2, 1926–1943.
37.
SunP.WangX.ZhuM. (2021). Modeling car-following behavior on freeways considering driving style. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 147(12), 04021083.
38.
TalebpourA.MahmassaniH. S. (2016). Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 71, 143–163.
39.
UraiA. E.de GeeJ. W.TsetsosK.DonnerT. H. (2019). Choice history biases subsequent evidence accumulation. ELife, 8.
40.
VakilS. S.HansmanR. J. (1997). Predictability as a metric of automation complexity. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 41(1), 70–74.
41.
van HuysduynenH. H.TerkenJ.EggenB. (2018). Why disable the autopilot?Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 247–257.
42.
VarottoS. F.HoogendoornR. G.van AremB.HoogendoornS. P. (2015). Empirical longitudinal driving behavior in authority transitions between adaptive cruise control and manual driving. Transportation Research Record, 2489(1), 105–114.
43.
VasconcelosL.NetoL.SantosS.SilvaA. B.SecoÁ. (2014). Calibration of the Gipps car-following model using trajectory data. Transportation Research Procedia, 3, 952–961.
44.
VerberneF. M.HamJ.MiddenC. J. (2015). Trusting a virtual driver that looks, acts, and thinks like you. Human Factors, 57(5), 895–909.
45.
YangX. J.SchemanskeC.SearleC. (2021). Toward quantifying trust dynamics: How people adjust their trust after moment-to-moment interaction with automation. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2107.07374.
