The current study was designed to empirically examine the role of nomophobia level and cellphone presence in distracted driving. Seventy-One participants consisting of 13 mild, 37 moderate, and 21 severe nomophobia individuals participated in the study. They were required to complete a series of questionaries and driving vignettes related to their cellphone being either accessible or not accessible. It was hypothesized that higher nomophobia level and lack of cellphone presence would result in higher subjective distraction and negative affect scores for each of the driving vignettes. Results indicated higher nomophobia level and the cellphone not being accessible resulted in significantly higher negative affect and subjective distraction. Furthermore, results highlighted individuals with moderate and severe nomophobia as being at higher probability to be easily distracted and engage in risky driving behaviors. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed, and directions for future research are also presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArcaA. A.StanfordK. M.MoulouaM. (2020, December). Effects of Individual Differences, Attention, and Memory Deficits on Driver Distraction. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 1196-1201). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
2.
BragazziN. L.Del PuenteG. (2014). A proposal for including nomophobia in the new DSM-V. Psychology research and behavior management, 7, 155.
3.
ElmoreT. (2014). Nomophobia: A rising trend in students. Psychology Today, 18, 2014.
4.
FarooquiI. A.PoreP.GothankarJ. (2018). Nomophobia: an emerging issue in medical institutions?. Journal of Mental Health, 27(5), 438441.
5.
FitchG. M.SoccolichS. A.GuoF.McClaffertyJ.FangY.OlsonR. L.…DingusT. A. (2013). The impact of hand-held and hands-free cell phone use on driving performance and safety-critical event risk (No. DOT HS 811 757).
6.
GeorgeA. M.BrownP. M.ScholzB.Scott-ParkerB.RickwoodD. (2018). “I need to skip a song because it sucks”: Exploring mobile phone use while driving among young adults. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 58, 382-391.
7.
HartantoA.YangH. (2016). Is the smartphone a smart choice? The effect of smartphone separation on executive functions. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 329-336. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.002. IBM Corp. Released 2021. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
8.
KingA. L. S.ValençaA. M.SilvaA. C. O.BaczynskiT.CarvalhoM. R.NardiA. E. (2013). Nomophobia: Dependency on virtual environments or social phobia?Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (1), 140-144.
9.
LeeS.KimM. W.McDonoughI. M.MendozaJ. S.KimM. S. (2017). The Effects of Cell Phone Use and Emotion-regulation Style on College Students’ Learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(3), 360-366. doi:10.1002/acp.3323
10.
León-MejíaA. C.Gutiérrez-OrtegaM.Serrano-PintadoI.González-CabreraJ. (2021). A systematic review on nomophobia prevalence: Surfacing results and standard guidelines for future research. PloS one, 16(5), e0250509.
11.
LeungS.-O.. (2011). A Comparison of Psychometric Properties and Normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 11-Point Likert Scales. Journal of Social Service Research, 37(4), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2011.580697.
12.
McnallyB.TitchenerK.. (2012). The role of affective processes on young drivers’ risk perceptions: a dual process model approach. Journal of Risk Research, 15(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2011.601321.
13.
MoulouaM.AhernA.RinalducciE.AlbertiP.BrillJ. C.QuevedoA. (2010). The effects of text messaging on driver distraction: A biobehavioral analysis. PsycEXTRA Dataset. doi: 10.1037/e578802012040.
14.
NasabN. M.ManshaeeG.NadiM. A. (2021). The effectiveness of nomophobia therapy on self-esteem and nomophobia symptoms in high school students. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci, 15(1), e109291.
15.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2018, September). Sum- mary of motor vehicle crashes: 2016 data. (Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT HS 812 580). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
16.
Oviedo-TrespalaciosO.TrueloveV.KingM. (2020). “It is frustrating to not have control even though I know it’s not legal!”: A mixed-methods investigation on applications to prevent mobile phone use while driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 137, 105412.
17.
PearsonM. R.MurphyE. M.DoaneA. N.. (2013). Impulsivity-like traits and risky driving behaviors among college students. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 53, 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.01.009
18.
Rodríguez-GarcíaA.-M.Moreno-GuerreroA.-J.López BelmonteJ. (2020). Nomophobia: An Individual’s Growing Fear of Being without a Smartphone—A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), 580. doi:10.3390/ijerph17020580.
19.
ThoméeS.HärenstamA.HagbergM. (2011). Mobile phone use and stress, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression among young adults-a prospective cohort study. BMC public health, 11(1), 1-11.
20.
Van GelderJ.-L.De VriesR. E.Van Der PligtJ. (2009). Evaluating a dual-process model of risk: affect and cognition as determinants of risky choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.610.
21.
YildirimC.CorreiaA. P. (2015). Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 130-137.
22.
YoungK.ReganM.HammerM. (2007). Driver distraction: A review of the literature. Distracted driving, 2007, 379-405.
