Internet users’ digital privacy decisions are closely connected with their level of trust of information security, privacy concern, and perceived risks and benefits of internet use. One psychological factor that may potentially alter such privacy-related behaviors is acute stress, as it has shown to influence individual’s general decision-making. The goal of this between-subject designed research is to explore whether acute stress can affect decision-making in the digital privacy domain. Additionally, other privacy-related factors that may moderate this relationship, including trust and privacy fatigue, will be examined. We expect that participants who are exposed to acute stress will have poorer privacy decision-making outcomes, which will be represented by more frequent acceptance of online cookies and default privacy settings. Moreover, this relationship is expected to be magnified among individuals with low levels of Internet trust and those with high levels of privacy fatigue.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BhattacherjeeA. (2002). Individual Trust in Online Firms: Scale Development and Initial Test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 211–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045715
2.
ByrneK. A.CornwallA. C.WorthyD. A. (2019). Acute stress improves long-term reward maximization in decision-making under uncertainty. Brain and cognition, 133, 84-93.
3.
ByrneK. A.PetersC.WillisH. C.PhanD.CornwallA.WorthyD. A. (2020). Acute stress enhances tolerance of uncertainty during decision-making. Cognition, 205, 104448.
4.
BauerJ. M.BergstrømR.Foss-MadsenR. (2021b). Are you sure, you want a cookie? –The effects of choice architecture on users’ decisions about sharing private online data. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 106729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106729
5.
Berg-BeckhoffG.NielsenG.Ladekjær LarsenE. (2017). Use of information communication technology and stress, burnout, and mental health in older, middle aged, and younger workers – results from a systematic review. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 23(2), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10773525.2018.1436015
6.
ChoiH.ParkJ.JungY. (2018). The role of privacy fatigue in online privacy behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.001
7.
DickersonS. S.KemenyM. E. (2004). Acute Stressors and Cortisol Responses: A Theoretical Integration and Synthesis of Laboratory Research. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 355–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/00332909.130.3.355
8.
DeutschM. (1960). The effect of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion. Human relations, 13(2), 123139.
9.
ElzingaB. M.RoelofsK. (2005). Cortisol-induced impairments of working memory require acute sympathetic activation. Behavioral neuroscience, 119(1), 98.
10.
FogelJ.NehmadE. (2009). Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Computers in human behavior, 25(1), 153-160.
11.
FurnellS.ThomsonK. L. (2009). Recognising and addressing ‘security fatigue’. Computer Fraud & Security, 2009(11), 7-11.
12.
GrossR.AcquistiA. (2005, November). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society (pp.71-80).
13.
GefenD.KarahannaE.StraubD. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS quarterly, 51-90.
14.
JarvenpaaS. L.KnollK.LeidnerD. E. (1998). Is Anybody out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 29–64.
15.
KulykO.HiltA.GerberN.VolkamerM. (2018). “this website uses cookies”: Users’ perceptions and reactions to the cookie disclaimer. Proceedings 3rd European Workshop on Usable Security.
16.
KrasnovaH.SpiekermannS.KorolevaK.HildebrandT. (2010). Online social networks: Why we disclose. Journal of information technology, 25(2), 109-125.
17.
KimD. J.FerrinD. L.RaoH. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision support systems, 44(2), 544-564.
18.
LuhurH.WidjajaN. (2014). Location-based social networking media for restaurant promotion and food review using mobile application. EPJ Web of Conferences, 68, 00022. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20146800022
19.
MelletK.BeauvisageT. (2020). Cookie monsters. Anatomy of a digital market infrastructure.Consumption Markets & Culture, 23(2), 110-129.
20.
MaierS. U.MakwanaA. B.HareT. A. (2015). Acute stress impairs self-control in goal-directed choice by altering multiple functional connections within the brain’s decision circuits. Neuron, 87(3), 621-631.
21.
OrgillG. L.RomneyG. W.BaileyM. G.OrgillP. M. (2004). The urgency for effective user privacy education to counter social engineering attacks on secure computer systems. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on Information technology education (pp. 177-181).
22.
PiersonJ.HeymanR. (2011). Social media and cookies: challenges for online privacy. info.
23.
PorcelliA. J.DelgadoM. R. (2017). Stress and decision making: effects on valuation, learning, and risk-taking. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 14, 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.11.015
24.
PetzoldA.PlessowF.GoschkeT.KirschbaumC. (2010). Stress reduces use of negative feedback in a feedback-based learning task. Behavioral Neuroscience, 124(2), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018930
25.
ParsonsK.McCormacA.ButaviciusM.PattinsonM.JerramC. (2014). Determining employee awareness using the Human Aspects of Information Security Questionnaire (HAIS-Q). Computers & Security, 42, 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2013.12.003
26.
SchwabeL.HaddadL.SchachingerH. (2008). HPA axis activation by a socially evaluated cold-pressor test Psychoneuroendocrinology, 33(6), 890–895.
27.
SteinfeldN. (2016). “I agree to the terms and conditions”: (How) do users read privacy policies online? An eye tracking experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 992–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.038
28.
StarckeK.BrandM. (2012). Decision making under stress: a selective review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(4), 1228-1248.
29.
StarckeK.BrandM. (2016). Effects of stress on decisions under uncertainty: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 142(9), 909.
30.
SchoofsD.WolfO. T.SmeetsT. (2009). Cold pressor stress impairs performance on working memory tasks requiring executive functions in healthy young men. Behavioral neuroscience, 123(5), 1066.
31.
SicariS.RizzardiA.GriecoL. A.Coen-PorisiniA. (2015). Security, privacy and trust in Internet of Things: The road ahead. Computer networks, 76, 146-164.
32.
TangJ.AkramU.ShiW. (2020). Why people need privacy? The role of privacy fatigue in app users’ intention to disclose privacy: based on personality traits. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.
33.
van den BosR.HarteveldM.StoopH. (2009). Stress and decision-making in humans: Performance is related to cortisol reactivity, albeit differently in men and women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34(10), 1449–1458.
34.
WemmS. E.WulfertE. (2017). Effects of Acute Stress on Decision Making. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 42(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-016-9347-8
