Using Virtual Reality for Training to Identify Cyber Threats in the Bridge of a Ship

Abstract

Seventeen college ROTC Navy midshipmen were recruited for an 8-week course that met twice weekly for lectures and training to identify cyber security threats in a virtual reality (VR) application. This VR trainer, the Cybersecurity Virtual Reality Trainer (CyVR-T) is an immersive application of a U.S. Navy destroyer. During the training scenarios one of the three designated systems (Voyage Management System, Radar Detection System, and Automatic Identification System) was hacked, showing erroneous information for a ship in the vicinity. In addition to the role of Trainee in the CyVR-T, participants observed their peers, held discussions after each scenario, and played the role of instructor. The trained midshipmen showed significant improvement in knowledge and cyber threat performance compared to a control group. Improved performance was noticed early in the program. CyVR-T showed to be a great tool for identifying cyber threats and has potential to be beneficial in more complex situations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Babin

A. K.

Dattel

A. R.

Klemm

M. F.

(2020). An alternative method for identifying a failed engine in twin- engine propeller aircraft. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 10(2), 103 – 111.

Barkley

E.F.

(2010). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. Jossey-Bass.

Bhagat

K. K.

Liou

Chang

(2016). A cost-effective interactive 3D virtual reality system applied to military live firing training. Virtual Reality: The Journal of the Virtual Reality Society, 20(2), 127 – 140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-016-0284-x

Dattel

A. R.

Babin

A. K.

Wang

. (in press). Human factors of flight training and simulation. In Keebler

J. R.

Lazzara

Blickensderfer

Wilson

Fausett

(Eds.). Human Factors in Aviation (3rd ed.). Elsevier.

Durso

F. T.

Rawson

K. A.

Girotto

(2007). Comprehension and situation awareness (pp. 163 – 193). In. Durso

F. T.

Nickerson

R. S.

Dumais

S. T.

Lewandowsky

Perfect

T. J.

(Eds.) Handbook ofApplied Cognition (2nd ed.), Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470713181.ch7

Endsley

M. R.

(2016). SA Demons: The Enemies of Situation Awareness (pp 50 – 61). Designing for Situation Awareness: An Approach to User-Centered Design: CRC Press.

Endsley

M. R.

Jones

D. G.

(2012). Designing for situation awareness: An approach to user-centered design (2nd ed.). Taylor and Francis.

Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2021). 2020 Internet crime report. https://www.ic3.gov/Media/PDF/AnnualReport/2020_IC3rpeort.pdf

Fetterolf

C. S.

(2020). Using augmented reality to enhance situational awareness for aircraft towing. Defense Technical Information Center. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1114524

10.

Kelly

S. W.

Burton

A. M.

Riedel

Lynch

(2003). Sequence learning by action and observation: Evidence for separate mechanism. British Journal of Psychology, 94(3), 355 – 372. doi:10.1348/000712603767876271

11.

Lee

V. S.

(2004). Teaching & Learning Through Inquiry. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing

12.

Liou

Chang

(2018). Virtual reality classroom applied to science education. 23rd International Scientific Professional Conference on Information Technology (IT), 2018, pp. 1 – 4. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPIT.2018.8350861

13.

University of North Georgia (2022). https://ung.edu/continuing-education/news-and media/cybersecurity.php

14.

Zhang

Kaber

Hsiang

(2010). Characterization of mental models in a virtual reality-based multitasking scenario using measures of situation awareness. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11(1-2), 99 –118. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220903010027