FerraroJ.ClarkL.ChristyN.MoulouaM. (2018). Effects of automation reliability and trust on system monitoring performance in simulated flight tasks. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2, 1232–1236.
2.
GallimoreD.LyonsJ. B.VoT.MahoneyS.WynneK. T. (2019). Trusting Robocop : Gender-Based Effects on Trust of an Autonomous Robot. 10(March), 1–9.
3.
HergethS.LorenzL.VilimekR.KremsJ. F. (2016). Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust during Highly Automated Driving. Human Factors, 58(3 PG-509–519), 509–519.
4.
HopkoS.WangJ.MehtaR. (2022). Human Factors Considerations and Metrics in Shared Space Human-Robot Collaboration : A Systematic Review. 9(February), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.799522
5.
Lanini-maggiS.RuginskiI. T.ShipleyT. F.HurterC.DuchowskiA. T.BriesemeisterB. B.LeeJ.FabrikantS. I. (2021). Computers in Human Behavior Reports Assessing how visual search entropy and engagement predict performance in a multiple-objects tracking air traffic control task. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4, 100127.
6.
LeeJ. D.MorayN. (1994). Trust-self-confidence-and-operators-adaptation-to-automation_1994_International-Journal-of-Human-Computer-Studies.pdf. In International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (Vol. 40, Issue 1, pp. 153–184).
7.
ParasuramanR.RileyV. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2), 230–253.
8.
ShiferawB.DowneyL.CrewtherD. (2019). A review of gaze entropy as a measure of visual scanning efficiency. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 96(December2018), 353–366.