The Role of Timing of Information Front-Loading and Planning Ahead in All-Human vs. Human-Autonomy Team Performance

Abstract

The current study examines the effects of teams front-loading information and planning ahead through team-level communication during action phases of taskwork on team performance across all-human and human-autonomy teams (HATs) in a Remotely Piloted Aircraft System-Synthetic Task Environment (RPAS-STE). Twenty-one three-member teams (two participants teaming with either a trained experimenter or autonomous agent) flew an RPA with the goal of photographing target waypoints. Basing action phases on Information-Negotiation-Feedback (I-N-F) loops, we used the time difference between F-I as an indication of a team front-loading information. Planning ahead was hypothesized to occur in teams with longer F-I times. We found that all-human teams performed better than HATs while engaging in less front-loading. This indicates that F-I might have been measuring an aspect of team coordination related to optimal timing of action phases and flow of performing taskwork. Effective teamwork may require the right person (agent) get the right information at the right time rather than front-loading information as much as possible.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ball

Myers

Heiberg

Cooke

N. J.

Matessa

Freiman

Rodgers

(2010). The synthetic teammate project. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 16(3), 271–299.

Chen

J. Y.

Barnes

M. J.

(2014). Human–agent teaming for multirobot control: A review of human factors issues. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 44(1), 13-29.

Cooke

Demir

McNeese

Gorman

Myers

(2020). Human–autonomy teaming in remotely piloted aircraft systems operations under degraded conditions. Office of Naval Research Technical Report for Grant No. N00014-17-1-2382

Cooke

N. J.

Gorman

J. C.

Kiekel

P. A.

(2008). Communication as Team-level Cognitive Processing. In Macrocognition in Teams (1st ed., pp. 51–64). Routledge.

Cooke

N. J.

Gorman

J. C.

Myers

C. W.

Duran

J. L.

(2013). Interactive team cognition. Cognitive Science, 37(2), 255–285.

Cooke

N. J.

Shope

S. M.

(2005). Synthetic Task Environments for Teams: CERTT’s UAV-STE. In Stanton

Hedge

Brookhuis

Salas

Hendrick

Editor (Eds.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods (pp. 41–46). CRC Press.

DeChurch

L. A.

Haas

C. D.

(2008). Examining team planning through an episodic lens: Effects of deliberate, contingency, and reactive planning on team effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39(5), 542–568.

Enders

C. K.

(n.d.). Three-factor mixed ANOVA (one between-and two within-subjects factors). Applied Missing Data: Companion website for Applied Missing Data Analysis. http://www.appliedmissingdata.com/three-factor-mixedanova.html

Faludi

(1973). Planning theory. New York: Pergamon Press.

10.

Fiore

S. M.

Wiltshire

T. J.

(2016). Technology as teammate: Examining the role of external cognition in support of team cognitive processes. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1531.

11.

Gorman

J. C.

Amazeen

P. G.

Cooke

N. J.

(2010). Team coordination dynamics. Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences, 14(3), 265.

12.

Lei

Waller

M. J.

Hagen

Kaplan

(2016). Team adaptiveness in dynamic contexts: Contextualizing the roles of interaction patterns and in-process planning. Group & Organization Management, 41(4), 491–525.

13.

Marks

M. A.

Mathieu

J. E.

Zaccaro

S. J.

(2001). A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes. The Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376.

14.

McNeese

N. J.

Demir

Cooke

N. J.

Myers

(2018). Teaming with a synthetic teammate: Insights into human-autonomy teaming. Human factors, 60(2), 262-273.

15.

Salas

Cannon-Bowers

J. A.

Blickensderfer

E. L.

(1993). Team Performance and Training Research: Emerging Principles. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 83(2), 81–106.

16.

UCLA: Statistical Consulting Group. (n.d.). SPSS Mixed Command. UCLA Advanced Research Computing: Statistical Methods and Data Analytics. https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/spss/seminars/spss-mixedcommand/

17.

Weingart

L. R.

. (1992). Impact of Group Goals, Task Component Complexity, Effort, and Planning on Group Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 682–693.

18.

Zijlstra

F. R. H.

Waller

M. J.

Phillips

S. I.

(2012). Setting the tone: Early interaction patterns in swift-starting teams as a predictor of effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(5), 749–777.