Strategy-Specific Decision Making with Incomplete Information

Abstract

Decision making rarely occurs in perfect environments with unlimited time and complete information. Additionally, individual variations in decision strategy are nuanced and time-evolving. It is therefore important to understand the effects of distributions of information under uncertainty, and that we do so with respect to a range of decision strategies. In this study we assess decision making in three decision environments covering both heuristic and analytic strategies. We find that the amount of information presented to the participant and the way in which that information is structured within each cue (across options) significantly affects decision performance in all environments. Additionally, the participants’ information access trends indicate that decision performance is linked with an adaptation of decision strategy to match the environment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Canellas

M. C.

Feigh

K. M.

Chua

Z. K.

(2015, Dec). Ac- curacy and effort of decision-making strategies with incomplete in- formation: Implications for decision support system design. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 45(6), 686-701. doi: 10.1109/THMS.2015.2420575

Dawes

R. M.

(1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American psychologist, 34(7), 571.

Einhorn

H. J.

(1970). The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory mod- els in decision making. Pyschological Bulletin, 73(3), 221-230. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0028695

Garcia-Retamero

Dhami

M. K.

(2009). Take-the-best in expert- novice decision strategies for residential burglary. Psychonomic Bul- letin & Review, 16(1), 163–169.

Garcia-Retamero

Rieskamp

(2008). Adaptive mechanisms for treating missing information: A simulation study. The Psychological Record, 58.

Garcia-Retamero

Rieskamp

(2009). Do people treat miss- ing information adaptively when making inferences? The Quar- terly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(10), 1991–2013. doi: 10.1080/17470210802602615

Gigerenzer

Goldstein

D. G.

(1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103(4), 650.

Hilbig

B. E.

(2010). Reconsidering “evidence” for fast-and-frugal heuristics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(6), 923–930.

Katsikopoulos

K. V.

Schooler

L. J.

Hertwig

(2010). The robust beauty of ordinary information. Psychological Review, 117(4), 1259.

10.

Martignon

Hoffrage

(2002). Fast, frugal, and fit: Simple heuristics for paired comparison. Theory and Decision, 52(1), 29–71.

11.

Payne

J. W.

Bettman

J. R.

Johnson

E. J.

(1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press.

12.

Rieskamp

Hoffrage

(1999). When do people use simple heuris- tics, and how can we tell? In Gigerenzer

Todd

P. M.

(Eds.), (pp. 141–167). New York: Oxford University Press.

13.

Rieskamp

Hoffrage

(2008). Inferences under time pressure: How opportunity costs affect strategy selection. Acta psychologica, 127(2), 258–276.

14.

Rieskamp

Otto

P. E.

(2006). Ssl: A theory of how people learn to select strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(2), 207.

15.

Sealy

W. I.

Feigh

K. M.

(2020). Information modifica- tion for time-limited decision making. In 2020 ieee interna- tional conference on human-machine systems (ichms) (p. 1-6). doi: 10.1109/ICHMS49158.2020.9209438

16.

Sealy

W. I.

Feigh

K. M.

(2021). Impact of missing information and strategy on decision making performance. In 2021 ieee international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (smc) (pp. 3140–3145).