BrimleyB. K.CarlsonP. J.HawkinsH. GJr. (2014). Use of fixation heat maps to evaluate visual behavior of unfamiliar drivers on horizontal curves. Transportation Research Record, 2458(1), 16-26.
2.
ClarkH.FengJ. (2017). Age differences in the takeover of vehicle control and engagement in non-driving-related activities in simulated driving with conditional automation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 106, 468-479.
3.
LargeD. R.BurnettG. E.MorrisA.MuthumaniA.MatthiasR. (2017). Design implications of drivers’ engagement with secondary activities during highly-automated driving–a longitudinal simulator study.
4.
LiangN.YangJ.YuD.Prakah-AsanteK. O.CurryR.BlommerM.… PittsB. J. (2021). Using eye-tracking to investigate the effects of pre-takeover visual engagement on situation awareness during automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 157, 106143.
5.
McDonaldA. D.AlambeigiH.EngströmJ.MarkkulaG.VogelpohlT.DunneJ.YumaN. (2019). Toward computational simulations of behavior during automated driving takeovers: a review of the empirical and modeling literatures. Human factors, 61(4), 642-688.
6.
SAE International Ground Vehicle Standard (2021) Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-road Motor Vehicles, SAE Standard J3016_202104, SAE International, Warrendale, PA, USA.
7.
WandtnerB.SchömigN.SchmidtG. (2018). Secondary task engagement and disengagement in the context of highly automated driving. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 58, 253-263.
