Evaluation of Visual Acuity and Perceptual Field of View Using the Varjo XR-3 Headset in a Virtual Environment

Abstract

Understanding the capabilities and limitations of virtual reality head-mounted displays are key to using virtual reality devices appropriately to display complex 3D information. This study sought to replicate and compare tests characterizing visual acuity and perception using the Oculus Rift and HTC Vive Pro head-mounted displays against the Varjo XR-3 headset. 14 participants tested the Varjo XR-3 in a series of visual and perceptual tasks. Performance in the central field of view was assessed using the Snellen and Landolt tests of visual acuity as well as contrast sensitivity circles. Visual performance in the peripheral field was measured by evaluating symbol and color detection at increasing levels of eccentricity. The Varjo XR-3 provides significantly better visual acuity compared to previously tested headsets. Symbol recognition in the peripheral region is similar when viewed through the Varjo XR-3 compared to in the real world and head movements play a significant role in increasing perceptual field of view.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anstis

S. M.

(1974). Chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position. Vision research, 14(7), 589-592.

Ayres

T. J.

(1996). Psychophysical validation of photographic representations. In The 1996ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (pp. 29-33).

Ayres

T. J.

Kubose

(2015, September). Calibrating a Contrast-Sensitivity Test Chart for Validating Visual Representations. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 380-384). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.

Bendell

Vasquez

Talone

A. B.

Jentsch

(2018, September). Evaluation and Benefits of Head-Mounted Display Systems for HRI Research. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 14841488). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.

Chessa

Maiello

Borsari

Bex

P. J.

(2019). The perceptual quality of the oculus rift for immersive virtual reality. Human-computer interaction, 34(1), 51-82.

Krauss

D. A.

(2015). Forensic aspects of driver perception and response. Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company.

Messina

Evans

J. M.

(2006). Standards for visual acuity. National Institute for Standards and Technology.

O’Shea

R. P.

Blackburn

S. G.

Ono

(1994). Contrast as a depth cue. Vision research, 34(12), 1595-1604.

Peli

(1996). Visual and optometric issues with head-mounted displays. IS & T/OSA Optics & Imaging in the Information Age, The Society for Imaging Science and Technology, available at, 364-369.

10.

Perez-Bayas

(2001, June). Human factors involved in perception and action in a natural stereoscopic world: an up-to-date review with guidelines for stereoscopic displays and stereoscopic virtual reality (VR). In Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems VIII (Vol. 4297, pp. 251-267). SPIE.

11.

Smythies

(1996). A note on the concept of the visual field in neurology, psychology, and visual neuroscience. Perception, 25(3), 369-371.

12.

Sproule

Jacinto

R. F.

Rundell

Williams

Perlmutter

Arndt

(2019, November). Characterization of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity using head-mounted displays in a virtual environment: A pilot study. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 547551). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.

13.

Stanney

K. M.

Mourant

R. R.

Kennedy

R. S.

(1998). Human factors issues in virtual environments: A review of the literature. Presence, 7(4), 327-351.

14.

Sutherland

I. E.

(1968, December). A head-mounted three dimensional display. In Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, falljoint computer conference, part I (pp. 757-764).

15.

Varjo Technologies. (2021, November 1). Varjo XR-3 - the industry’s highest resolution XR headset: Varjo. Varjo.com. Retrieved February 14, 2022, from https://varjo.com/products/xr-3/.

16.

Wann

Mon-Williams

(1996). What does virtual reality NEED?: human factors issues in the design of three-dimensional computer environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44(6), 829-847.

17.

Yamamoto

Philbeck

J. W.

(2013). Peripheral vision benefits spatial learning by guiding eye movements. Memory & cognition, 41(1), 109-121.