Attentional Considerations in Advanced Air Mobility Operations: Control,Manage,or Assist?

Abstract

The implementation of automation will enable Advanced Air Mobility (AAM), which could alter the human's responsibilities from those of an active controller to a passive monitor of vehicles. Mature AAM operations will likely rely on both experienced and novice operators to supervise multiple aircraft. As AAM constitutes a complex and increasingly autonomous system, the human operator's set of responsibilities will transition from those of a controller, to a manager, and eventually to an assistant to highly automated systems. The development of AAM will require system designers to characterize these three sets of human responsibilities. The present work proposes different human responsibilities across various roles (i.e., pilot in command, system operator, system assistant) in the context of AAM along with pertinent attention-related constructs that could contribute to each of the three identified roles of AAM operators including situation awareness, workload, complacency, and vigilance.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Antcliff

Borer

Sartorius

Saleh

Rose

Gariel

. . .Ouellette

(2021). Regional Air Mobility. NASA. Retrieved February 10, 2022, from https://sacd.larc.nasa.gov/sacd/wp-content/uploads/sites/102/2021/04/2021-04-20-RAM.pd

Bainbridge

(1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19, 775-779.

Billings

C. E.

(1997). Aviation automation: The search for a human-centered approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Billings

C. E.

Lauber

J. K.

Funkhouser

Lyman

E. G.

Huff

E. M.

(1976). NASA aviation safety reporting system. Washington, DC: NASA.

Chancey

E. T.

Politowicz

M. S.

Le Vie

(2021). Enabling advanced air mobility operations through appropriate trust in human-autonomy teaming: Foundational research approaches and applications. AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum.

Comstock

J. R.

Arnegard

R. J.

(1992). The multi-attribute task battery for human operator workload and strategic behavior research (Technical Memorandum No. 104174). Hampton, VA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley Research Center.

Cummings

M. L.

Bertucelli

L. F.

Macbeth

Surana

(2014). Task versus vehicle-based control paradigms in multiple unmanned vehicle supervision by a single operator. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 44, 353-361.

Dekker

S. W.

Woods

D. D.

(2002). MABA-MABA or abracadabra? Progress on human-automation co-ordination. Cognition, Technology & Work, 4, 240-244.

Endsley

M. R.

(1987). The application of human factors to the development of expert systems for advanced cockpits. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 31, 1388-1392. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193128703101219

10.

Endsley

M. R.

(1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human factors, 37, 32-64.

11.

Endsley

M. R.

(1997). Supporting situation awareness in aviation systems. In 1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation (pp. 4177-4181). IEEE.

12.

Endsley

M. R.

(2017). From here to autonomy: lessons learned from human-automation research. Human factors, 59, 5-27.

13.

Endsley

M. R.

Kaber

D. B.

(1999). Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics, 42, 462-492.

14.

Endsley

M. R.

Kiris

E. O.

(1995). The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human factors, 37, 381-394.

15.

Galster

S. M.

Duley

J. A.

Masalonis

A. J.

Parasuraman

(2001). Air traffic controller performance and workload under mature free flight: Conflict detection and resolution of aircraft self-separation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11, 71-93.

16.

Goodrich

K. H.

Theodore

C. R.

(2021). Description of the NASA urban air mobility maturity level (UML) scale. AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum.

17.

Hancock

P. A.

Williams

Manning

C. M.

Miyake

(1995). Influence of task demand characteristics on workload and performance. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 5, 63-86.

18.

Hancock

P. A.

(2017). Imposing limits on autonomous systems. Ergonomics, 60, 284-291.

19.

Hancock

P. A.

Scallen

S. F.

(1997). The performance and workload effects of task re-location during automation. Displays, 17, 61-68.

20.

Harris

W. C.

Hancock

P. A.

Arthur

E. J.

Caird

J. K.

(1995). Performance, workload, and fatigue changes associated with automation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 5, 169185.

21.

Hart

S. G.

(2006). NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, 50. 904-908.

22.

Holbrook

J. B.

Prinzel

L. J.

Chancey

E. T.

Shively

R. J.

Feary

M. S.

Dao

Q. V.

Ballin

M. G.

Teubert

(2020). Enabling urban air mobility: Human-autonomy teaming research challenges and recommendations. AIAA Aviation Forum, Virtual Event.

23.

Kaber

D. B.

Endsley

M. R.

(2004). The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5, 113-153.

24.

Kaber

D. B.

Prinzel

L. J.

(2006). Adaptive and adaptable automation design: A critical review of the literature and recommendations for future research. (NASA/TM-2006-214504). Hampton, VA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley Research Center.

25.

Karpinsky

N. D.

Chancey

E. T.

Palmer

D. B.

Yamani

(2018). Automation trust and attention allocation in multitasking workspace. Applied ergonomics, 70, 194-201.

26.

Lee

J. D.

Seppelt

B. D.

(2012). Human factors and ergonomics in automation design. In Salvendy

(Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics (4^th ed., pp. 1615-1642). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

27.

Mackworth

N. H.

(1948). The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1, 6-21.

28.

McVay

J. C.

Kane

M. J.

(2012). Drifting from slow to "d'oh!": Working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 525-549.

29.

Metzger

Parasuraman

(1999). Free flight and the air traffic controller: Active control versus passive monitoring. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 43, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129904300101

30.

Metzger

Parasuraman

(2001). The role of the air traffic controller in future air traffic management: An empirical study of active control versus passive monitoring. Human factors, 43, 519-528.

31.

Metzger

Parasuraman

(2005). Automation in future air traffic management: Effects of decision aid reliability on controller performance and mental workload. Human factors, 47, 35-49.

32.

Mutzenich

Durant

Helman

Dalton

(2021). Updating our understanding of situation awareness in relation to remote operators of autonomous vehicles. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6, 1-17.

33.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2020). Advancing aerial mobility: A national blueprint. National Academies Press.

34.

Parasuraman

(2000). Designing automation for human use: empirical studies and quantitative models. Ergonomics, 43, 931-951.

35.

Parasuraman

Cosenzo

K. A.

De Visser

(2009). Adaptive automation for human supervision of multiple uninhabited vehicles: Effects on change detection, situation awareness, and mental workload. Military Psychology, 21, 270-297.

36.

Parasuraman

Manzey

D. H.

(2010). Complacency and bias in human use of automation: An attentional integration. Human factors, 52, 381410.

37.

Parasuraman

Molloy

Singh

I. L.

(1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced 'complacency'. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 1-23.

38.

Parasuraman

Sheridan

T. B.

Wickens

C. D.

(2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 30, 286297.

39.

Pritchett

Portman

Nolan

(2018). Research & Technology development for human-autonomy teaming-Final report: Literature review and findings from stakeholder Interviews. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA.

40.

Roth

E. M.

Sushereba

Militello

L. G.

Diiulio

Ernst

(2019). Function allocation considerations in the era of human autonomy teaming. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 13, 199-220.

41.

Rovira

McGarry

Parasuraman

(2007). Effects of imperfect automation on decision making in a simulated command and control task. Human factors, 49, 76-87.

42.

Sarter

N. B.

Amalberti

(Eds.). (2000). Cognitive engineering in the aviation domain. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

43.

Sato

Yamani

Liechty

Chancey

E. T.

(2020). Automation trust increases under high-workload multitasking scenarios involving risk. Cognition, Technology & Work, 22, 399-407.

44.

Sheridan

T. B.

(2011). Adaptive automation, level of automation, allocation authority, supervisory control, and adaptive control: Distinctions and modes of adaptation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 41, 662-667.

45.

Sheridan

T. B.

Verplank

W. L.

(1978). Human and computer control of undersea teleoperators. Massachusetts Inst of Tech Cambridge Man-Machine Systems Lab.

46.

Thomson

D. R.

Besner

Smilek

(2015). A resource-control account of sustained attention: Evidence from mind-wandering and vigilance paradigms. Perspectives on psychological science, 10, 82-96.

47.

Tiwari

Singh

A. L.

Singh

I. L.

(2009). Effects of automation reliability and training on automation-induced complacency and perceived mental workload. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 35, 9-22.

48.

van de Merwe

van Dijk

Zon

(2012). Eye movements as an indicator of situation awareness in a flight simulator experiment. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 22, 78-95.

49.

Warm

J. S.

Dember

W. N.

Hancock

P. A.

(1996). Vigilance and workload in automated systems. In Automation and human performance: Theory and applications. Human factors in transportation. (pp. 183-200). Hillsdale, NJ.

50.

Warm

J. S.

Parasuraman

Matthews

(2008). Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human factors, 50, 433-441.

51.

Wickens

C.D.

McCarley

J.S.

(2008). Applied Attention Theory. CRC Press.