Human factors research that addresses driver-automation interaction is required to mitigate crashes related to the deployment of automated vehicles. While Automated Driving Systems still require driver supervision, there will remain room for human error. This paper presents results from the first in a series of experiments that aim to estimate driver situation awareness using spontaneous gaze behavior and to ensure the driver is ready for takeover. Spontaneous gaze behavior was studied and compared among 13 participants between partial driving automaton and driver assistance automations condition to extract indicators of the out of the loop phenomenon.
de NauroisC. J.BourdinC.StratulatA.DiazE.VercherJ.-L. (2019). Detection and prediction of driver drowsiness using artificial neural network models. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 126, 95104.
3.
GouraudJ.DelormeA.BerberianB. (2017). Autopilot, mind wandering, and the out of the loop performance problem. Frontiers in neuroscience, 11, 541.
4.
KaberD. B.OnalE.EndsleyM. R. (2000). Design of automation for telerobots and the effect on performance, operator situation awareness, and subjective workload. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 10, 409–430.doi: 10.1002/1520-6564(200023)10:4<409::AIDHFM4>3.0.CO;2-V
5.
MarsF.DerooM.CharronC. (2014). Driver adaptation to haptic shared control of the steering wheel. Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).
6.
MeratN.SeppeltB.LouwT.EngströmJ.LeeJ. D.JohanssonE.…ItohM. (2019). The “out-of-theloop” concept in automated driving: Proposed definition, measures and implications. Cognition, Technology & Work, 21(1), 87-98.
7.
MoleC. D.LappiO.GilesO.MarkkulaG.MarsF.WilkieR. M. (2019). Getting back into the loop: the perceptual-motor determinants of successful transitions out of automated driving. Human factors, 61(7), 1037-1065.
8.
ParasuramanR.MolloyR.SinghI. L. (1993). Performance consequences of automationinduced’complacency’. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(1), 1-23.
9.
ParasuramanR.RileyV. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human factors, 39(2), 230-253.
10.
SAE International. (2018). Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles (J3016). In: Society for Automotive Engineers.
11.
SchnebelenD.CharronC.MarsF. (2020). Estimating the out-of-the-loop phenomenon from visual strategies during highly automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 148, 105776
12.
SchoolerJ. W.MrazekM. D.FranklinM. S.BairdB.MooneyhamB. W.ZedeliusC., et al. (2014). “The middle way,” in Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Elsevier), 1–33.
13.
StawarczykD.MajerusS.Van der LindenM.D’ArgembeauA. (2012). Using the daydreaming frequency scale to investigate the relationships between mind-wandering, psychological well-being, and present-moment awareness. Front. Psychol. 3:363. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00363
14.
SternJ. A.BoyerD.SchroederD. (1994). Blink rate: a possible measure of fatigue. Human factors, 36(2), 285-297.
