A Text Mining Analysis of Complacency and the Role of Complexity in the Tree-Felling Operations of Wildland Firefighters

Abstract

The term complacency is often referenced in many risk and safety domains, despite a unifying definition for the term currently backed by the field of psychology. Complacency has been listed as a cause for accidents in the domain of wildland firefighting. Moreover, fires resulting in fatalities or near-fatalities share a common factor of occurring on small fires or deceptively quiet areas of larger fires. This fact suggests complacency may be a key factor in circumstances that lead to the deaths of firefighters. This study analyzes the application of complacency in wildland firefighting tree-felling accident reports to develop a guiding framework informed by complexity thinking for determining a theory of complacency within the domain. Using a text mining method for accident report analysis, we aim to develop a framework for understanding complacency in this domain. A framework of complacency can help to inform firefighting risk management strategies and potentially save lives.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahadh

Binish

G. V.

Srinivasan

(2021). Text mining of accident reports using semi-supervised keyword extraction and topic modeling. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 155, 455 - 465.

Årstad

Aven

(2017). Managing major accident risk: Concerns about complacency and complexity in practice. Safety Science, 91, 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.004

Dekker

S. W.

(2015). The danger of losing situation awareness. Cognition, Technology, & Work, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0320-8

Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (n.d.). Textbooks. Hfes.gov. Retrieved from https://www.hfes.org/Resources/Textbooks

Jagarlamudi

Daume

III Udupa

(2012). Incorporating lexical priors into topic models. Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 204 – 213

National Transportation Safety Board (2011). Review of U.S. Civil Aviation Accidents, 2007–2009. Retrieved from https://www.ntsb.gov/safety/data/Documents/ARA1101.pdf

National Wildfire Coordinating Group (2021). Common denominators of fire behavior on tragedy fires. Retrieved from https://www.nwcg.gov/committee/6mfs/common-denominators-of-fire-behavior-on-tragedy-fires

National Wildfire Coordinating Group (2022, January). NWCG incident response pocket guide (IRPG), PMS 461. Retrieved from https://www.nwcg.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pms461.pdf

National Wildfire Coordinating Group. (2008). Principles of hazard tree risk management. Retrieved from http://www.nwcg.gov/sites/default/files/committee/docs/httfs-risk-mgmt.pdf

10.

Parasuraman

Manzey

D. H.

(2010). Complacency and bias in human use of automation: An attentional integration. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 52(3), 381–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810376055

11.

Toner

Montero

B. G.

Moran

(2015). The perils of automaticity. Review of General Psychology, 19(4), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000054

12.

United States Department of Agriculture. (2016). Field Guide for Danger-Tree Identification and Response along Forest Roads and Work Sites in Oregon and Washington. Retrieved from https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fseprd512960.pdf

13.

United States Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). eTool: Logging - Manual Operations - Felling Trees. Retrieved from https://www.osha.gov/etools/logging/manual-operations/felling

14.

Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center (2019, October). 2004-2019 Tree felling accident analysis.