This panel introduces the current practice of human performance modeling and its applications to Human Factors research and discusses how we can promote modeling education. We argue that there is a necessity for new and more engaging learning tools and environments that can include qualitative and quantitative modeling work in Human Factors curricula to fulfill different levels of approaches in Human Factors research. We hope that this panel can encourage more students and junior researchers to utilize modeling in their work and spark exciting discussions for better modeling practice and education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaoS.WuL.YuB.SayerJ. R. (2021). An examination of teen drivers’ car-following behaviour when compared to adult drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 147, 105762.
2.
FengS.FengY.SunH.BaoSZhangY.LiuH. (2020). Testing scenario library generation for connected and automated vehicle evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2020.2988309
3.
GroverS.PeaR. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43.
4.
JeonM. (2015a). What to Teach in HCI? How to Educate HCI Students to Envision the Future of Human Being, not the Future of Technology?. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 59, No.1, pp. 362366). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
5.
JeonM. (2015b). Towards affect-integrated driving behavior research. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 16(6), 553-585.
6.
JeonM. (2016). How is nonverbal auditory information processed? Revisiting existing models and proposing a preliminary model. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 1529-1533). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
7.
JeonM.ZhangY.JeongH. P.JanssenC.BaoS. (2021, September). Computational Modeling of Driving Behaviors: Challenges and Approaches. In 13th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 160-163).
8.
JeongH.LiuY. (2016, September). Computational Modeling of Finger Swipe Gestures on Touchscreen: Application of Fitts’ Law in 3D Space. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 17211725). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
9.
JeongH.LiuY. (2017a, May). Modeling touchscreen pinch and spread gestures in a computational cognitive architecture. In IISE Annual Conference. Proceedings (pp. 2177-2182).
10.
JeongH.LiuY. (2017b, June). Modeling of stimulus-response secondary tasks with different modalities while driving in a computational cognitive architecture. In 9th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design (pp. 5864).
11.
JeongH.LiuY. (2019). Computational modeling of touchscreen drag gestures using a cognitive architecture and motion tracking. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(6), 510-520.
12.
KoS.KutchekK.ZhangY.JeonM. (2022). Effects of non-speech auditory cues on control transition behaviors in semi-automated vehicles: Empirical study, modeling, and validation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 38(2), 185-200.
13.
LiuY.FeyenR.TsimhoniO. (2006). Queueing Network-Model Human Processor (QN-MHP) A computational architecture for multitask performance in human-machine systems. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 13(1), 37-70.
14.
MarrD. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. MA: Cambridge, The MIT Press.
15.
McClellandJ. L. (2009). The place of modeling in cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 11-38.
16.
ParasuramanR.SheridanT. B.WickensC. D. (2008). Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: Viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2(2), 140-160.
17.
ParkJ.ZahabiM. (2021, September). A novel approach for usability evaluation of mobile applications. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 437-441). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
18.
YuB.BaoS.FengF.SayerJ. (2019). Examination and prediction of drivers’ reaction when provided with V2I communication-based intersection maneuver strategies. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 106, 17-28.
19.
YuB.BaoS.ChenY.LeBlancD. J. (2021). Effects of an integrated collision warning system on risk compensation behavior: An examination under naturalistic driving conditions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 163, 106450.
20.
XuY.BaoS.PradhanA. K. (2021). Modeling drivers’ reaction when being tailgated: A random forests method. Journal of Safety Research, 78, 28-35.
21.
ZhangY.WuC.WanJ. (2016). Mathematical modeling of the effects of speech warning characteristics on human performance and its application in transportation cyberphysical systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(11), 3062-3074.
22.
ZhangY.WuC.QiaoC.SadekA.HulmeK. F. (2022). A Cognitive Computational Model of Driver Warning Response Performance in Connected Vehicle Systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
23.
ZhangY.WuC. (2017, September). Learn to Integrate Mathematical Models in Human Performance Modeling. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 776-780). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
